https://youtu.be/7sAm3RtWh4M

Investigation discovers the surprising result that slicers introduce more error into prints than the printer itself.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    As an old toolmaker, Welcome to the world of understanding your process! And knowing the limits of that process.

    I wonder what he actually expects for a tolerance day to day. A +/-.1mm IS doable if you’re careful. But there is enough randomness in the FDM process, even outside the slicer, that I wouldn’t bet the farm on any 1 random piece hitting that tolerance. Let alone repeating that level of tolerance every time over say, 100 parts.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A +/-.1mm IS doable if you’re careful

      The software is introducing more than .1mm before it gets the printer in certain situations. No amount of care can fix that. In the video he starts with his calibration cube that has been tuned to perfect (as far as his calipers can measure). But then he printed a complex part (skull because he’s in bio medicince) and its WAY off because the slicer itself messed up the hotend positioning commands.