I don’t know how many not tech savvy people know this, but it helps too.
I don’t know how many not tech savvy people know this, but it helps too.
Could bluesky have won over Mastodon because of the fediverse barrier where people doesn’t know which server to choose?
Maybe it didn’t started for that goal.
Year of linux desktop?
And so do Soviet Union too. /s
Welcome to Web 3 I guess. Automated systems ignoring real actors
Ehm, it is already like that. Most of smart TVs use Android which is under Google control, a big (if not the biggest) ad company.
Brave is chromium.
Marketing
Now it’s working.
503 Service Unavailable
No, use Tenacity instead.
So did we started using that three assholes char?
It’s the best example in my opinion, because it is full of fake versions of popular piracy sites because Google hides the originals.
And it is the only site I know ddg shows certification every time.
Ddg already have this for some sites.
what OP is referring to is actually the “distributed” nature of git, where i.e. it’s easy to copy the entire history of an instance.
Exactly. Isn’t decentralized itself since it’s not a platform but by being “indipendent” and not entangled with anything you can just copy it entirely and host it somewhere else.
Yes but no, because I don’t want to not interact with a repo at all just because it’s on github for whatever reason (if there’s one).
But yes, I understand your feelings. Fuck M$
Git itself isn’t decentralized is about people copying it and sometimes mirroring it.
Anyway it is a good habit to avoid github entirely (when hosting a repo).
Do bluesky advertise itself?