This does not implies that we should never suppress it either

That implies the bad government will care about following the laws, or won’t change the law or its enforcement

Then have a nap again while you compile GTK/qt/and whatever else

Hopefully the time for negotiations is past

Should be the state’s job to support the child financially in these circumstances, there’s nothing necessary about making a victim of rape financially burdened as a consequence of their being raped.

At least as a woman, assuming you don’t live in crazy religious places, you usually have the option of an abortion, as a man you are denied all agency

Good on you for asking instead of blindly following this “tradition”, I hope you heed what most people are saying here. Progress happens one personal decision at a time, you can be a part of that

I will sometimes walk up to an hour or so to go somewhere but that’s more occasional, for something I need to do regularly 30 minutes is the upper end. Above that, I would usually look at public transports, bike, or car options

1h15 for 3.7 km sounds quite slow though, I would expect closer to 45 minutes for that kind of distance around where I am

It’s the volume of a cylinder, pi times height times radius squared

Proportional voting would actually make smaller parties be able to have representatives, breaking up the 2 party system and promoting more diverse point of views. You can also have mixed systems, with locally elected reps for a part of the house, and the rest of the house being filled in a manner that the end result is proportional to the global voting share

The (local) universe

He’s certainly a SpaceX fan, which I think is a lot more defensible than being a Musk fan

Being unable to comply (signal) and selectively refusing to comply while still having access to the data (telegram) is not equivalent

Isn’t that what wasm kinda is?

Sudden crowd movements are a real impact with potentially deadly consequences, panic is not something to be dismissed

Why is volume a fair discount? Should a single person pay more for their groceries than a family?

Just because you have a national solution that’s crap doesn’t mean the rest of us should agree to have a European solution that’s crap too, even if it’s less crap than what you already have.

I’m not knowledgeable enough about this particular project to be able to give an informed opinion as to whether it’s bad or good (though the article raises some points I would consider concerning), I was merely reflecting that there can be enough valid criticism of the implementation of something that’s good and useful in theory to make it simply bad, and that not every criticism can be dismissed by saying something is better than nothing.

Bad is the enemy of good, too