• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m more of a socialist than an anarchist, although i sympathize with anarchists - socialism and anarchism can have quite some overlap.

    Any you really should work on your reading skills, because what i wrote and what you want to understand are two very different things. Since they don’t log IPs when not court ordered, no court can retroactively extract that data, and to be honest, if you know that you might attract government attention, using Tor or a VPN (yes, even ProtonVPN would have sufficed in this case) is basic OpSec - both would have prevented actionable intel being logged.

    • XLE@piefed.socialBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      You sound like you would be absolutely outraged if you found out Proton marketed itself towards activists. Have you looked at the promises on their homepage recently?

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you are an activist and don’t use basic OpSec, you have only yourself to blame in this age.

        • XLE@piefed.socialBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Shifting the blame of corporate lies onto the activist they lie to.

          You socialist anarchists area a funny bunch.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You know who really lied? The French authorities. Had they truthfully informed the swiss court about the reality of the situation, they would have gotten a tactful variant of “get lost” as a response from the swiss.

            • XLE@piefed.socialBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I find it funny how you socialists look at a company homepage, read

              We are a neutral and safe haven for your personal data, committed to defending your freedom.

              and then decide to defend that company’s lie.

              • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                defending freedom under the rules of swiss laws, which are pretty neutral when put in worldwide perspective. Also, “defending your freedom” is not equivalent with “selfdestruct for your freedom”. What would have been the alternative? you remind me of this:

                • XLE@piefed.socialBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  “Proton should be honest somewhat”

                  “And yet activists stupidly trusted their marketing and signed up!”

                  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You still haven’t offered an alternative to cooperating with an court order of the country your business is located in - as long as you can’t do that, every further discussion is pointless.