Lina Khan is a key architect of an aggressive attempt by Washington to rein in tech giants. Amazon may be next.

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair Lina Khan will reportedly meet with representatives from Amazon (AMZN) next week in what could be the last face-to-face between the parties before the commission files an antitrust suit against the e-commerce giant.

  • echoplex21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appreciate Lina Khan at least trying even if it feels like a huge uphill battle . For example the Microsoft case; even though she lost, her stance on any large acquisition has ensured some concessions are made even before it goes to trial such as the COD and Cloud agreements.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s being appealed, and the judge should be impeached for failing to recuse herself (the judge’s son works for Microsoft and has a lot of stock that will gain a lot of value if the deal does finally go through.)

    • ketseki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I appreciate that they tried but God damn did the FTC shit the bed with that case. Their arguments were awful and they threw so much pointless shit at the wall that even the judge was getting fed up with their BS.

      • echoplex21@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly there wasn’t much of a case to begin tbh. Even the CMA’s best resort was going to cloud and that turned out also to be BS as well.

      • glockenspiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The judge got fed up because her son works for Microsoft and thus the family is heavily invested–stock wise–in the company.

        The judge should’ve been forced to recuse. Microsoft also should’ve had its breakup orders enforced decades ago, instead of having it tossed out by a cabal of judges.

        Microsoft would be a totally different company if they didn’t have just Azure to subsidize all their own projects which operate at cost or loss to run competitors out.

    • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not trying to be an asshole, but there’s no way she has the experience necessary for this and that hurts everyone. Tech is complicated and when you combine that with antitrust, a new comer is not going to do it.

      • Yendor@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you actually read up on her, or are you just assuming that based on her age?

        https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/29/podcasts/the-daily/is-washington-finally-ready-to-take-on-big-tech.html

        The FTC has been run by old white guys for decades, and it’s been going backwards. Linda Khans essay on antitrust (as a postgrad student) has basically reframed the governments and legal professions approach to antitrust (although real change will be slow, with decades of bad precedent to undo). She went straight from being the top student at Yale Law, to being a professor at Columbia Law and simultaneously the counsel for the House committee on anti-trust.