downpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agopreachlemmy.worldimagemessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1978arrow-down120
arrow-up1958arrow-down1imagepreachlemmy.worlddownpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square170fedilink
minus-squareTheLurker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareneo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoLegally speaking they’re not going after you solely for piracy pretty much ever, at least not in America, unless you’re making a profit from it.
minus-squaremasquenox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years ago I just want to point out to anyone who thinks this is a viable legal defence, It isn’t. Of course it isn’t. Copyright laws were written by the same kind of people who decided that corporations gets to “people.”
deleted by creator
Legally speaking they’re not going after you solely for piracy pretty much ever, at least not in America, unless you’re making a profit from it.
Of course it isn’t. Copyright laws were written by the same kind of people who decided that corporations gets to “people.”