They are supposed to be grown from spores, so what use are ork nipples?

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is. I wasn’t being specific enough, sorry. Actual use in terms of evolutionary fitness. There are no reasons for them evolutionarily other than they are a byproduct of fetal development.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anything that makes people hornier and more likely to procreate is an evolutionary advantage.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I suppose you’re right. It’s not just things that help things live longer or thrive in a specific environment.

    • Strider@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s the thing with natural selection though, as long as a trait isn’t deleterious and it’s common enough it’ll generally stick around. There’s no pressure for males to not have nipples.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Totally agree with your point. But it’s also not something that will actively promote fitness.

        • Strider@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Doesn’t matter. There’s no reason to not have nipples, and going down the evolution rabbit hole to change that isn’t worth the random mutations that are more likely to just straight up kill males during development or something. In biology fitness just means the ability to successfully reproduce, not actually who’s stronger or more efficient. Your entire body is built on the concept of, “good enough to get the job done.”

          • BreadOven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Agreed. All about the ability to reproduce, not actual strength or “fitness” as most people would think of.

            But yeah, they’re more or less vestigial as far as I’m concerned. Good point on it not worth getting rid of because that would probably be more detrimental (as you stated).