• 2910000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Enough internet users are familiar with the adage “if a product is free, you are the product”, through personal experience

    I’d be OK with paying for Firefox if it meant that it was stripped of all association with advertisers. And presumably, if Mozilla were freed from that association, they’d be able to make a stronger case for how they’re protecting a free internet

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Maybe you would. The vast vast majority wouldn’t.

      Not many people care about privacy from big tech, and those that do probably know what FOSS is and would know that they can trivially get Firefox for free.

      I also doubt that Mozilla could get the hundreds of millions per year that they need to maintain a modern web browser engine, keep up to date on security, etc.

      • 2910000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        This story marks the loss of another revenue stream for Mozilla. Their business is increasingly reliant on Google’s search deal for money, and if that money stops, they’ll have to face that same reckoning. For example, they won’t be able to afford paying their CEO millions of dollars a year any more.

        I think they should start repositioning themselves now as an activist organisation that is fighting corporate interests trying to control the internet. If they can do that, I think a lot of people would pay to use Firefox