• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me it’s whatever. The upsides are small but they still far outweigh the one downside

    I doubt these people are just doing it for kudos, though.

    • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, broadly I do agree with this. It’s whatever. Maybe I was too harsh. I’m not trying to be critical of someone who’s at least trying to make the world a better place, even if I think the way they’re going about it is a little artificial and silly. I do think it’s artificial and silly though.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a little silly but I’m for making these changes but the only real defense for keeping them is “it’s always been that way!” which is just a flawed argument

        • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hold on, lemme put on my downvote boots.

          To me the defense is, if people are going around and saying that calling it an “Inca Dove” is racist or misogynistic and we all have to spend time and money and effort changing it around to something else, then it’s going to hinder genuine efforts to resolve racism or misogyny because some people are going to start putting it alongside the “Inca Dove” thing into a category of “stupid stuff that doesn’t matter.” Changing “Oldsquaw” sounds great because that’s actually racist. Changing the confederate name thing, eh, it seems weird to me but I can see it. “Inca Dove,” alright now you’re just making up stuff to get upset about and asking everyone else to play along with it and if they don’t want to, they’re some kind of bad person.

          Just my opinion.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I won’t downvote you (and haven’t been), we’re having a civil conversation!

            I didn’t take the Inca Dove example as being about racism but can’t speak to what the people deciding were thinking. For that one, if the “official” name is straight up wrong…I think it should be changed. More-literal names are always good in science, I think.

            The only similar example that comes to mind IS a bit racist (Indians->Native Americans) but I was on board with that push because they aren’t Indian.

            Then again, I grew up in the Midwest where tons of city names reference non-existent geographical feature. Including “Heights” to the names of extremely flat cities is dumb but it doesn’t really bug me.

            I guess I just don’t know exactly where I stand on it but I’d take the more accurate naming any day.

            • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Haha oh yeah, I wasn’t talking about you. Just I’ve noticed that certain viewpoints tend to attract a lot of downvotes here. I suspect that a lot of people like to do performative antiracism more than they do genuine antiracism, because it’s a lot less work, and that extends to giving out vigorous downvotes to the “wrong” point of view.

              But yeah, I can see the argument too. Everyone’s going to draw the line of what’s okay and not okay to say in different places, and at the end of the day I do think there’s something to be said for trying to make the world a better place even in some kind of trivial way.

          • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think anyone is suggesting that Inca Dove is offensive so much as it’s inaccurate, and while we’re doing a mass name change, might as well change that one too.

            Honestly, I wish we would just bite the bullet and do this with a lot of inaccurately named biochemistry stuff lol