The same can be said about the search results. For search results, you have to use your brain to determine what is correct and what is not. Now imagine for a moment if you were to use those same brain cells to determine if the AI needs a check.
AI is just another way to process the search results, that happens to give you the correct answer up front, most of the time. If you go blindly trust it, that’s on you.
What matters to me is what tools the browser lets me use to complement it and harden it to my liking.
Chromium does not offer that. But if I’m going to use Chromium, it would be Brave browser, since it provides tools comparable to what I use in Firefox.
To me, how is a browser going to be attacked if the scripts the attacker would use are already blocked by my toolset? (Rhetorical)
Ooooh that. Yeah I get that with android auto.
I’ve recently turned off all apps (including google) permission to draw over other apps and that seems to have stopped it for me, on Pixel 8.
Article mentions 3rd party launcher gesture issues, but I’ve never seen this problem. I used to use Nova but switched to Smart launcher for the blur, but at no time have gestures been an issue. Any ideas what they mean?
And jump to the clone? Mozilla isn’t better (consider their recent Ad Privacy clone), they just have less market share.
That said, I use Firefox and Brave. Whatever I feel like at the time.
Brave has added a feature to explicitly enable MV2 apps and install uBo directly from Brave settings. You can also install uMatrix and Adguard MV2 versions also.
Um, if you’re security minded, you’re already staying far away from Authy, so I’m not really sure what the article’s focus is.
That said, I’m using 2fa all day long on Grapheneos. No issue. And prior to Grapheneos, I ran rooted and had been using Authy with no issue, so this kind of sounds like an advertisement piece for Authy.
So they get to keep their Ad Privacy malware and cookies. Sounds like that was their endgame.
It’s ok. Everyone else will do it for them.
I stopped reading after Brave, as you chose to derail your product reviews to meddle in someone’s personal beliefs. Those two things have no correlation.
I’m guessing these are changes for chrome users? I haven’t seen any of those new AI changes. Granted I don’t use Google primarily, and was only testing a few times.
Kids will be kids. FTFY
I recommend ShareX instead. Waaaay better.
But from the very beginning years ago, it was understood that when you post on these types of sites, the data is not yours, or at least you give them license to use it how they see fit. So for years people accepted that, but are now whining because they aren’t getting paid for something they gave away.
Anyone care to explain why people would care that they posted to a public forum that they don’t own, with content that is now further being shared for public benefit?
The argument that it’s your content becomes false as soon as you shared it with the world.
The fact that they specifically mentioned those search engines, when I checked back in late March, was a selling point for me.
In not sure I would have even tried it if I only saw the new wording.
Searches are good on Kagi though, but Brave Search Premium is trying to catch my attention.
Yeah I had to stop reading because they started bashing the people behind Kagi instead of the actual product.
The product has been working great for me. As for the founder, well I’m minding my own business.
I don’t use Instagram, but I also don’t want any politics in my cereal, so that would be fine here.
Data mining.
If you knew what the sources were, you wouldn’t have needed to search in the first place. Just because it’s on a reputable website does not make it legit. You still have to reason.