With a bluetooth modem lol

2015. Rural Germany.

I don’t really know what to write here without becoming uncivil. You’re using big words like science, humanity, everyone, whole continents, ‘extensive education’ - there’s power in reflexion when thinking about discrimination (im Deutschen Diskriminierung und_bis Benachteiligung).

Have you read “Was weiße Menschen nicht über Rassismus hören wollen, aber wissen sollten” by Alice Hasters?

Please. “Vergangenheitsbewältigung” cannot be applied to racism as a whole, neither did it happen in the way that would justify a national mythos (vgl “Gegenwartsbewältigung” by Max Czollek). Please don’t point fingers as a European. And German.

I think the room is a bit crowded. You can barely see the walls.

Do people sometimes ride on them?

Was soll das?

Yeah, they’re for-profit banks and not everyone is a member who has an account.

I have yet to find any country in Europe or South America with US-style credit unions

Huh? Maybe I don’t know what a US-style credit union is, but the German-language countries have large banking Genossenschaften (cooperatives), often called People’s bank. Many of them have origins in farmers lending each other money.

I don’t know about Fennoscandia, but it would surprise me if there aren’t equivalents, given the cooperationist history in very local economies.

anything goes

Democracy 1-4

hysterically

Hey…

The Passage-goosebumps

Wait, did they plan a Chapter 7?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_over_USB

Modding relies on stability AFAIK.

There are FOSS games with a single branch for development, which doesn’t scale well for stability, but works fine with slow development.

Others, have stable and experimental branches with backporting and so on. Probably works better, but too much delay between stable and experimental makes people play on experimental. Stable releases are expensive (redundant bugfixing, backporting, feature freezing/completing etc.), so not every projects has or wants them. Fast development might enable modding to turn into internal (optional) features though.

I’d argue that at this point, sticking to the collective vs individual dichotomy of climate attribution and action potential is climate action delayist. When your argument relies you or your group intentionally doing absolutely nothing to combat climate change, you don’t really have climate change in mind.

Leftism sometimes cares more about class than its very foundation, the environment, to understand why there is a problem with blame-shifting.

I’ve seen this in a similar fashion in relationship advice forums: Commenters not engaging with the issue or person, but knee-jerk reacting with advising instant breakup.

I haven’t been on reddit for over a year, but I cannot imagine that topics like say atheism don’t polarise. What makes you think it is the case?

I don’t quite understand your point. Do you maybe have some examples to understand better?

This is quite an individualist mindset; I was mainly talking about YT Trends-type of music - music likely listened to by millions, shaping the minds of millions.