It is a point for them to coexist. It’s called plausible deniability.

What exactly are you trying to argue? That it’s not a good reason for a country to get a bunch of uranium without raising questions?

There was absolutely no incentive to research more about alternative fuels, uranium and plutonium were materials the nuclear powers wanted. For more than just 1 reason…

If countries REALLY wanted nuclear power without Uranium. They would have researched it. Like China have. But no one else has. Well some have, but they all gave up a long time ago.

Sweden was researching it, but decided to go with Uranium, coincidentally, they just happened to also research nuclear weapons… very strange coincidence that… (Sweden was later encouraged to halt all nuclear weapons research)

Yes. They compete for the same raw material. That’s the whole point. Gives you a perfectly good reason to excavate it.

It gives you a reason to access the materials you need for nuclear weapons.

Who is saying they’re using the fuel for reactors to make the weapons? Just you.

And not that I count it. But they do infact make weapons from spent uranium. They make artillery shells from it. Buy like I said. I don’t even count that.

US experiments were broken off because it gives no excuse to attain materials for nuclear weapons. Same excuse everyone else use.

It says each member will assist the attacked party/parties, as it deems necessary.

My interpretation of the article is that assistance is mandatory. What type of assistance is up to the member to decide

https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/topics_110496.htm?selectedLocale=en

You report it stolen to the police. You report it stolen to your home insurance (if you have one). Then you get a new phone and move on with your life.

People talk about theft protection settings. They’re good to have. But they’re most likely not gonna get you your phone back.

Shit happens, mistakes are sometimes made. Valve once had code that could delete your entire drive.

Wikipedia is not a source. It’s fine to take information from Wikipedia. But if you are doing actual research. You need to cross reference that with the source cited to make sure it’s accurate.

Most Wikipedia pages have their sources listed so you can easily look them up and verify their validity.

If there are no sources cited. You should be cautious.

You seriously need to work on your handwriting. I’m impressed OCR can make out anything at all from that.

This isn’t a OCR problem. This is a you problem. I’m human and I can only make out a few words.

Edit. Assuming it’s yours. Or is this from the scientific article? Regardless. Whoever wrote that needs to go back to third grade and redo their writing exercises.

Sweating makes my body dirty, why the hell does showering in water make it clean???

Like who tf made up that rule? Maybe it’s just different kinds of dirty???

More is mentioned in this pdf if your curious. This one is in English.

I will highlight the most important part

we will never surrender. Any suggestion to the contrary is false.

https://www.msb.se/sv/publikationer/om-krisen-eller-kriget-kommer-pa-engelska/

It’s compulsory with a huge asterisk next to it.

If they call you in, it’s compulsory.

However, they call far from everyone, and there’s about 1001 things you can do to not get called for service if you really don’t want to.

First step is that you’re sent a form to fill out. Questions about your health and habits among other things. So. If you really don’t want to… Let’s just say they probably won’t be too interested in someone that (allegedly) smokes 1-2 pack of cigarettes a day.

Not to be confused with the Swedish concept of “Total Defense” (probably poorly translated). Should “total-defense” be called however. Everyone between 16 and 70 have to report in for war-duty. This doesn’t mean everyone is going into battle. But it means you have to be at service for the defensive effort of our nation. Could be administrative tasks, logistical, construction, anything really, depends on who you are and what your experience is. This is not something you can get out of. It’s one of your duties as a citizen

Jag är säker. Fler dumma frågor?

Why wouldn’t Europeans be ready to hear that? Pretty sure we’ve been hearing it on a regular basis since the 70’s

Ain’t no way you gonna put all of Europe into that statement. You do understand that each country have their own system, policies and regulatory laws?

The problem here is that what you’re saying is maybe true for a handful of countries while completely false and inaccurate for a handful of others.

We’re not one single entity. Your statement is just not accurate as a whole.

First comment is not correct either. Everyone does not fill out a form at 18.

Maybe you should stop posting things you cannot verify.

No one is talking about that other than you.

Your first part is how mandatory military service is just to teach how to kill. Which is not true.

Most countries don’t need military service to work on community projects. Because people already know how their communities work, and there just isn’t a need for that type of slave labour.

What the military can get called in for though are things like disaster relief or searches for missing people where you need to look through a whole forest.

Unfortunately. Mandatory military service is critical to many countries survival. You NEED to have a population that understand the basics of how to organise a defense.

It’s the difference between being a country or being a province.

I will quote a Major in his response to why we don’t practise defense coming from the west.

“it’s possible we might be attacked from the west, but it would be a very long and strange route for the Russians to take”

Colourful image with no source. Just a bcbp logo which, wtf is that?

It’s not even accurate. At least not for Sweden. So, if they got that wrong. I will assume the rest is possibly wrong too.

Ever been to IKEA

I’m Swedish. So yes. I think it’s fair to say I’ve been to IKEA. I stand by what I said.