I mean this is a good idea, but the opposite of the question stated. Are there no think tanks to implement liberal solutions as opposed to stopping or fixing conservatives policies.
Why can’t we scheme as well as conservatives?
I mean this is a good idea, but the opposite of the question stated. Are there no think tanks to implement liberal solutions as opposed to stopping or fixing conservatives policies.
Why can’t we scheme as well as conservatives?
I’ve also heard negatives about oatmeal. Like hard to absorb. As a plant, like kale absorbs all nutrients, good and bad, which doesn’t balance out.
Cheap calories, but I think it’s not a super food.
Ai llms have learned from us. Good and bad. It doesn’t know the difference between good and bad unless you tell it.
So you have to know what’s good or bad from the get go before using it and trusting it yet.
And some blindly trust ai already… Which its far from that level of trust
“until something works" At least you’re doing a better job than some people.
Some leave it at will ai told me so. And they don’t know better and put that into prod!
Godspeed to all the brain dead idiots who will sign up for this, and will become even more literally brain dead after getting the implant.
I didn’t know this was how adblockers and sites worked in general.
If the html file is on the users device and they overwrite it, via an ad blocker, that is in their rights as the property owner of the machine.
Seems like sites need to get creative in new ways to force ads, which I’m sure will be a different kind of intrusive, instead of trying to push their ownership into the space of the users systems.
Ok, but that’s for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.
In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they’d be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.
How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.
How would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?
And if it’s just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?
I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn’t we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.
Maybe it’s the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.
More democratic this way
I don’t care if this is don’t peer reviewed yet or not.
This is HUGE in terms of future potential.
Within our lifetime we will have so many advances in terms of vaccines and drugs to prevent mass debilitating and death diseases, due to new technologies available.
Woo! Let’s go science?
I believe there is an initiative by some big banks to push for wire transfers to be done via a blockchain as opposed to slow ach transfers.
They call it quantum computing or something like that… but seemed like it had potential to solve some issues with slow banking
I mean, phones hand so much space now. Does it matter?
I know I can root and get rid of stupid apps, but like I just downloaded sent movie or Playlist I needed for a two week trip without any issue on space on my fold 4. So… why does the extra crap layer these days.
Early days, I’d root as my phone degraded over time. Now… why bother
Lol sort of. That’s more like two people talking at the same time at each other. But more kicking
I have actually dealt with a partial deaf blind student back in elementary school.
You can sign ASL into their hand so they can feel what you’re signing(normally individual letters). Or they hold your hands to feel the gesture/sign you’re are making.
They read braille as a just a blind person would.
But over all takes more effort to learn this way.
I think if you only watch the original trilogy, Jedi are the good, pure, saviors of the galaxy and rebels of the established order and the sith are evil overlords who rule by their own design.
When you watch the original you see how the Jedi appear good and balanced, but over the trilogy become less focused on ruling by laws and more on feelings. Clearly bypassing their own laws as it suits those in charge.
Subsequent tv series continuously adds to that mindset that the Jedi were flawed, and sometimes outright dangerous.
I always saw the Jedi assuming the chosen one myth was about the Jedi becoming the absolute rulers so egotistical, they were destined to fail.
And as flawed as the new trilogy is, it follows that path, leading to Rey becoming a true balanced force user, neither Jedi or sith. And both have seemingly been destroyed otherwise. So Rey is really the chosen one