CoyoteFacts

Better yet, why put yourself at the mercy of something that can enshittify in the first place? I’ve never understood why people get into selfhosting and then go right back to giving power over their network to a 3rd party again.

This video has a lot of self-hosting and somewhat advanced stuff being mentioned, but if all you want to do is start dipping your toe into Linux then it’s not nearly as hard as you’d think. I would try running Linux in a VM (i.e. VirtualBox) to get a feel for how it operates and build up confidence that way, as well as maybe watching some videos on how people set up and use their Linux etc. It will be a learning curve, but as long as you pick a beginner-friendly distro (e.g. Linux Mint) it’s really no more difficult than if you started using Windows for the first time. Keep backups of your data and/or put Linux on a secondary computer and you should weather the initial few weeks just fine.

On the upside, when you have problems in Linux there will be logical solutions with answers that can be searched for, whereas in an OS like Windows or Mac the solution is probably “I dunno! Reinstall?” or “You just can’t do that, sorry”. It’s also understandable if you don’t want to touch anything complicated, but I do think one of the best parts of Linux is really just getting messy, making mistakes, and learning. Because things in Linux make sense, over time you’ll learn how to use a computer again. I feel strongly that Windows/Mac/Android/iPhones have (intentionally) dulled the average person’s computing skills and put them into a state of learned helplessness. Everyone thinks computers are complicated wizardry because nothing on those proprietary operating systems makes logical sense, and trying to troubleshoot anything results in wasted time and frustration.

Pretty good video. It’s not like he explains how to do anything or even picks very good software to begin with, but his genuine excitement is really all that’s required. Getting people interested is the important part, and they’ll learn much better by using their own motivation. This video also gives off a strong “I’m an idiot, and if I can do it you can do it” vibe which can be really reassuring to those who are just too intimidated to even dip their toe in.

That really seems like a structural problem to me. Break it out into more-focused teams, signify important people whose messages you should pay attention to, or use threads to consolidate topics. If those things aren’t being done and there’s just 50+ people dumping information then the information can’t be deemed important. Adding AI to patch the issue is poor management at best and introducing poisoned information at worst.

I know this is not a unique sentiment by any means, but it makes me legitimately angry to think of participating in a conversation where someone else is using this. If you don’t want to read my messages why are we even connecting; imagine clicking “summarize” on someone genuinely trying to talk to you. “Sorry, the AI hallucinated that you were going to finish the rest of the assignment tonight.” and a year later “Sorry, I forgot all the nuances of who you are as a person because an AI didn’t think they were relevant.”

I’m used to LanguageTool, and at a glance it seems like Harper covers way fewer rules than LanguageTool does. Not sure if this is actually noticeable in practice, but I run my own LanguageTool server and am not too picky about the performance, so I’m not in a rush to move until someone figures out a good way to compare them. LanguageTool’s rules are all open source at least, so it’s only a matter of time before Harper gets anything it might be missing.

Mailbox.org is a good pick to consider IMO. You can read some comparisons on PrivacyGuides, which I also recommend as a starting point for these sorts of topics. The mailbox.org web UI is not great, but it allows IMAP/SMTP access, so I use Thunderbird on both desktop and Android in order to interact with my inbox. My inbox is auto-encrypted with PGP using their Mailbox Guard thing, so my emails are all encrypted garbage on the web UI anyway. Mailbox.org only allows paid-for accounts, but considering the annoying stuff that Proton and Tuta do to their free accounts I’d rather just be honest about the service I’m getting. It allows auto-forwarding directly in the web UI, but given that you can hook up to it with IMAP anyway, it’s not like you couldn’t just do it yourself.

(Also, as another comment said I also recommend DuckDuckGo’s Email Protection for email aliasing if you need it.)

The straw that broke the camel’s back for me is the CEO’s icky tweet about how great Republicans are for your privacy and how they stand up for the little guys (what), which they doubled down on using the official Reddit Proton account. There’s already been a ton of discussion about this on the internet if you care to look for more angles on it.

But before that I’d already grown quite leery of them for their trend of endlessly starting new services before the old ones are polished, along with trying to push everyone into their walled garden and endlessly using naggy popups in the UI about it. Worst of all, they have a clear trend of not giving a damn about Linux support, sometimes giving up on certain features for their Linux clients or releasing the clients way after the Windows/Mac versions. For a “privacy company”, not putting Linux as a first-class citizen is really just unacceptable, and they’ve been around for long enough that it’s clearly a trend and not a fluke. To me, Proton just feels like a wannabe version of Apple. Its continued actions give me the feeling that it exists to serve itself, not its users.

I don’t support Proton for other reasons, but I’ll note that if anyone is having this problem you can use a half-measure of setting your other email address as a recovery email and enabling “daily email notifications”, which will email you once a day if there’s unread stuff in your Proton mailbox.

Also consider that you’re adding another party that you need to trust to the chain, and also adding another point of failure if iodéOS stops releasing.

I’ve been using this a lot lately, and it’s been great after a bit of a learning curve. It even incorporates some of the functionality from the addons and userscripts that I needed for YouTube, like getting rid of clickbait titles/thumbnails and blocking specific channels. Since you never really have a tracking profile when using YouTube this way, it’s very obvious when YouTube is trying to shoe-horn in political channels and clickbait, and you can just continually keep blocking those channels in the recommended section until you get all of them. I’m still missing a way to boost the volume on certain videos that are too quiet for me, though. I use LibRedirect to auto-open YouTube links in FreeTube. FreeTube has occasionally broken because of YouTube API updates, which requires them to figure out the problem and push a new FreeTube release (which could take a day or more), but other than that I’m fairly happy with it.

I don’t have any experience with iCloud Private Relay, but I’d be surprised if enabling it will make you un-fingerprintable (in which case what are you really trying to accomplish by using it?). Also, who are you trying to stay private from? Do you personally believe that Apple and/or Cloudflare aren’t selling or trading your data? Would you be okay with them being the only ones that control your data if they’re not selling it? It’s a nuanced topic, and likely you’re the only one that can answer your position on that. It’s cliché, but defining a threat model can help a lot with deciding how many conveniences you are okay with giving up. I would likely argue that an Android phone with LineageOS can be made more private than an iPhone, but at the cost of security. Does your threat model need to sacrifice privacy for security?

Regarding iPhone vs Android, I’ve only ever used Android, but my friends with iPhones and Macs never seem to have access to the open-source software that I use and recommend, so I feel like that’s a big part to consider also. You’ll get roped into a proprietary ecosystem where it seems like every little app is trying to charge you money and won’t show you what it’s doing behind the scenes. If you already have an iPhone I’d understand if you need to weigh the economic feasibility of buying an entire new phone just for privacy as well.

Personally, I don’t really trust anything unless I’m given infallible reason to trust it, e.g. cryptographic proofs, audits, zero-trust models etc.; in this world it seems inevitable that someone will take advantage of your trust either today or tomorrow. If someone is truly on your side, they will do everything they can to take the need to trust them out of the equation, and failing that they should make it as clear as they can what trust is still mandatory and why. If you want to trust someone that doesn’t meet these standards, you do so basically at your own risk, and you’ll have to start doing some mental calculus on what they could get from you, what they might want it for, and how eager you think they would be to start misusing it (e.g., if you pay for a service, the servicer may feel less compelled to subsidize their income by selling your data).

I am paid a fuck-ton so my answer is definitely yes, but I really think it would vary person-by-person. “Should” people need to work 5 days per week to get that pay? My answer is probably no.

My corporate job is one of the better ones in terms of pointless BS and people pretending to be their corporatesonas, but every time I take time off I’m reminded that we’re wasting our entire lives with work. I take a few 4-day work weeks and suddenly my house is clean again, I’m cooking more interesting meals, writing code for fun, hanging out with friends, catching up on shows, etc. Imagine how much progress, art, and innovation we could have if everyone’s natural talents and interests were given space to exist. Long-term we would have so much more of everything, and everyone would be happier and healthier. Unfortunately, short-term we’ve gotta layoff 4% of our workforce again because Mr. AI said it might make the line go up.

How so? I feel it is an example of the effect because customers are drawn in with a low price and are surprised by a plethora of seemingly-sneaky fees, which take up a large portion of the total bill. Customers feel negatively about the long list of fees and the implication that they’ve been tricked, but they wouldn’t think twice if the fees were just included in the base price. It is against their best interest to be automatically and opaquely charged for all regular services (i.e. normal airlines) instead of being transparently given the option to forego those that they do not care about (i.e., fee-based airline).

I remember someone talking about an airline that advertised very low prices up-front but then added tons of fees for every individual thing, and when adding all the fees up for the service you’d expect with any other airline the end price would be the same. However, given that all the services/fees are technically optional, this is actually an ideal pricing model since you don’t have to pay for any services you don’t want.

It’s important to use services with a workflow that works for you; not every popular service is going to be a good fit for everyone. Find your balance between exhaustive categorization and meaningless pile of data, and make sure you’re getting more out than you’re putting in. If you do decide that an extensive amount of effort is worth it, make sure that the service in question is able to export your data in a data-rich format so that you won’t have to do it all again if you decide to move to a different tool.

The comment collapsing I think is fine; Lemmy-style forums already heavily rely on voting to move content around, and I think net -10 is a pretty good indicator that the comment in question has bad info, is a troll, or is otherwise not good content (as voted by the local community).

The low karma icon I’m seeing out in the wild and honestly, so far every time I see someone with that icon I look at that profile and sure enough there really are a lot of downvoted comments and antagonistic behavior. It’s probably handy to determine whether someone is sealioning, trolling, or just otherwise has a lot of bad takes (again, as voted by their local community) before deciding whether to waste energy trying to engage in a thoughtful conversation.

4chan screenshots being reported is pretty opinionated (the rationale being that it’s not about the content itself, it’s about the normalization of 4chan and the enablement of the alt-right pipeline it provides), but hopefully it’s at least optional?

It’s much better at federation than Lemmy.

Do you have an example or source for what this means? Like is it faster/more efficient to propagate things, more featureful in what it federates, etc.?