I want to be more mindful of the things I buy. I want to support local business first even if that means taking an hour or two to find something I like, instead of a few minutes.

It has a second benefit of filtering what I really need instead of what I want.

It is another small step to reduce my carbon footprint.

Yeah that was the issue. I though I had switched to my LTE network connection from my phone, but my phone was still on my local network.

Thanks for the answer

You are right and I should have been more precise.

I understand why docker was created and became popular because it abstracts a lot of the setup and make deployment a lot easier.

I hate how docker made it so that a lot of projects only have docker as the official way to install the software.

This is my tinfoil opinion, but to me, docker seems to enable the “phone-ification” ( for a lack of better term) of softwares. The upside is that it is more accessible to spin services on a home server. The downside is that we are losing the knowledge of how the different parts of the software work together.

I really like the Turnkey Linux projects. It’s like the best of both worlds. You deploy a container and a script setups the container for you, but after that, you have the full control over the software like when you install the binaries

I edited the post. Since it’s all local it’s fine to show the IP. It’s just a reflex to hide my ips.

I use IP directly as I don’t have a local domain configured properly.

The outpost ip in my configuration file is the same provided in the outpost on Authentik.

I am trying to get it to work still, but I am pretty sure that the issue is between Authentik and Firefly.

I don’t see any of the headers (x-authentik-email more specifically) specified in the caddy file when Authentik is sending the request to Firefly. The only header I see is x-authentik-auth-callback.

I am not sure how I can specify which headers are sent in Authentik.

Thanks for the suggestion

I am open to paid SMTP service if you have any suggestion. I was not planning on running my own instance.

Otherwise, what would be my options to have a functional SMTP server for Authelia?

Technology is still evolving at break neck speed. On the other hand, companies are degrading/restricting these new techs to make more money.

You bet it is! It will throw more money at a custom CRM than any other company.

Trump doesn’t give a fuck. He just want to stay out of prison for all the terrible things he did.

Every company wants a custom CRM or a customized one instead of choosing a CRM that fits the most important features that the company need and adapt the other processes to fit with the stock CRM as much as possible.

Fighting a CRM is a money pit and in the end, it becomes the worst of both worlds (expensive and shitty to use with the company processes)

Yeah but that time is long gone. Finance is throwing number in air of growth and profitability that must be met no matter what, and IT have to battle between what is effective, what the company tell them to do and what the users want, and in many case, the IT has a misplaced elitist attitude, like every user should know the infrastructure by heart and fix their problem themselves.

If a company uses other Microsoft products, chance are that Teams is bundled with whatever license they have. So for IT, it’s one less service to manage.

Lots of people care because it creates e-waste.

If the culture changes so that all consumers act like that and forces the companies to change their production cycle, that would be a big boon for the environment.

The issue isn’t you doing your hobby projects however you want, it’s people being paid and produce LLM generated code.

And the biggest issue is managers/c-suites thinking that LLMs can replace senior devs.

And the biggest biggest issue is that the LLMs in their current mainstream form are terribly bad for the environment.

It’s rarely the case. You rarely work in vacuum where your work only affects what you do at the moment. There is always a downstream or upstream dependency/requirement that needs to be met that you have to take into account in your development.

You have to avoid the problem that might come later that you are aware of. If it’s not possible, you have to mitigate the impact of the future problems.

It’s not possible to know of all the problems that might/will happen, but with a little work before a project, a lot of issues can be avoided/mitigated.

I wouldn’t want civil engineers thinking like that, because our infrastructure would be a lot worse than it is today.

There is no issue here from Bitwarden POV, except the pushback they receive now.

Bitwarden got VC funding and the bell is ringing to bring the cows back in to be milked dry.

They are testing the water to see how people react, scale back a bit through whatever lies/PR, and will just wait for the right time to shove more shit.

This is a pattern we’ve seen over and over again.

The direction that the company is taking. Clearly that Bitwarden feels like other open source projects are diverting revenue from them.

That’s a small step towards enshittification. They close this part of the software, then another part until slowly it is closed source.

We’ve seen this move over and over.

Stopping your business with Bitwarden over that issue sends a message that many customers don’t find this acceptable. If enough people stop using their service, they have a chance to backtrack. But even then, if they’ve done it once, they’ll try it again.

Your current price is 10$/year now. But the moment a company tries to cull any open source of their project is the moment they try to cash it in.

Do you have good resources to read on risc-v. I hear about it a lot, but haven’t found meaningful resources (to me) on it.

Thanks

I am the person that you called brain damaged. Clearly some reading comprehension issues.

You have the social skills of a rock and it shows.