You take that back
You take that back
I’ll roll the dice
I’m convinced I’m the only person on the planet that thought it was a banger.
IIIITTTSSS BEEEN A LOOOOOOOONNNG ROOOAAAADDD
Shran is one of my favorite recurring characters in any series. So is weyoun.
Do…people not share our opinion?
A computer scientist, presumably.
Nothing beats the bang/buck ratio of used enterprise hardware (always buy new drives though if you care about the data)
https://www.theserverstore.com/ https://www.serversupply.com/ https://www.servermonkey.com/
I’ve bought from all of these in the past, personally I’m a fan of dells but there are arguments for just about any of the major 3 (dell, hp, sueprmicro)
Personally my main server right now is an r630. 96 threads, 768gb of ram. With that many memory channels, not only can you run all of what you listed, you can even do medium-sized inferencing/diffusion if you’re interested in that sort of thing.
Idk, this was kind of a rare combination of “write secure function; proceed to ignore secure function and rawdog strings instead” + “it can be exploited by entering a string with a semicolon”. Neither of those are anything near as egregious as a use after free or buffer overflow. I get programming is hard but like, yikes. It should have been caught on both ends
Because that bug was so egregious, it demonstrates a rare level of incompetence.
Because $350 couldn’t possibly buy enough hardware to run a modern operating system!
Super dodgeball for the NES.
Deceptively simple, but much deeper than it seems on first glance. Each character has 2 different special abilities that change the way you throw. Especially if you can get a few buddies to huddle around the tv with you, will keep you all entertained for hours.
This is probably the play they’re making; the only thing that makes me think it might be something else is that they also announced ditching proprietary code in favor of kvm in workstation. Makes me wonder if they instead are deciding to slowly kill the product line, and instead of just stopping development entirely, they’re giving it out as if it’s some huge gift to try and “buy” good will before it becomes an inferior product?
Either way, support costs for the product are now $0 (because you can’t buy it) and development costs are about to be near-zero if they’re forking upstream kvm.
bill helped his brother jack, off a horse
bill helped his brother jack off a horse
Commas are important, who knew? If only he had paid attention in English class!
Personal computer taken to a company help desk, humans + horses
Hundreds of gigabytes of horse porn, right in a folder on his desktop called “horse”. The thumbnail of the folder made it incredibly clear what the folder was and what was in it, which was made extra clear by the max zoom his desktop icons were set to. (it was like, no joke, almost 1/10th the screen).
Fun fact: that was the day I learned my state doesn’t have mandatory reporting laws for animal abuse, only csam.
The thing about rational actors, is when given the same information they should make the same choices. I would argue that they’re most likely, instead, just at the peak of mt. stupid
We shouldn’t blame the victims that society failed to properly educate. You’re right that if people intimately understood apple the way you probably do, they’d never buy an apple product. I would argue, however, that it’s a failing of education not an informed choice to be corporately cucked.
It 100% is part of the character; so is the accent if you didn’t know. He speaks a perfect Midwestern accent when not in character
I don’t think anyone should expect a battery replacement to be free after 10 years, but it shouldn’t cost $100,000
I think you’ve correctly identified their self-interest over altruism, but you’ve misidentified the internal value of discouraging clickbait. YouTube is a treasure trove for building training datasets, and its value increases when metadata like thumbnails, descriptions, titles, and tags can be trusted.
It’s the AI gold rush; notice how this coincides with options to limit or disable third-party training but not first-party training? It coincides but is definitely not a coincidence.