They specifically talk about this in the article. How is that misleading?

several contemporary documents all point to the existence of a guy named something like Joshua

IIRC, there’s really only a single mention of a possible link to someone of this name that was crucified at the supposed time, and that single mention happened at least 50 (maybe 100?) years later, and there’s evidence that this passage was added even later.

So I didn’t think it’s true that there are “several contemporary documents” like you claimed…

You’re getting down voted, but you are mostly correct.

I feel like the amount of ads and/or length is a little excess these days, though.

The thing is, Google isn’t dumb. They’ve user tested this strategy and they know it results in higher revenue.

And the enshitification continues…for those that don’t pay

Do they get the water as hot as traditional tank water heaters?