Jesus Christ what the fuck.

I think the title indicates that it’s like the malware known as “Christmas.exe”.

Edit: I have too much faith in humanity…

Yes!

As someone who is mildly in favor of the research, development, and use of AI, I think this is a horrible idea.

Removed by mod

Well I’d say it’s when the proletariat revolts, destroying the machine of exploitation, at which gathering further profit is impossible.

Yes; theoretical ones.

Okay, I’ve had a nice nap, so here’s the answer: I’d take over Putin’s body, demand the nearest person’s gun, and rid the world of him (Putin) once and for all.

I’m making a distinction between money as a system of abstracting wealth and what wealth practically means. You’re making a highly disputable philosophical argument about the ontological nature of money instead of engaging with the germaine ideas. Simply put: I don’t consider a physical representation of money to be money in-and-of-itself; I consider each bill to be a part of a grand fragmented ledger. Furthermore, bitcoin is literally a public ledger for which there is no physical exchange of any representation of money. As a final example, the Yap isles famously have a monetary system that has physical Incarnations but no physical exchange among the people of the isles. It’s literally just a public ledger that exists in the minds of those who use it.

Technically, money is just a number on a ledger. Practically, there’s a finite amount of wealth in the solar system, much less on earth, significantly less accessible to humans and only a slim amount can be taken from the working class before people start starving. We already have little enough that the population is going to start contracting.

That’d take more than a minute.

“Stop eating our young!”

*another

Would it’s get me banned to reply with “I love reading about CEOs getting killed, and I want more of them to die”?

Edit:in minecraft.

I want to be remembered for my so-far meager and obscure contributions to the field of mathematics.

Most likely I’ll be remembered as intelligent, kind and sarcastic by a few friends.

Yar-har fiddle-dee-dee!

Any brand of authoritarianism.

How many years have you studied mathematics? If you really believe that, it can’t be more than 2 after high-school.

Edit: better question: Can you define “equivalence relation”? I don’t want you to be creative, I want the standard definition you come across in any foundations class.

This is the least coherent thing I’ve read all year. Congratulations.

This is actually wrong. You can have an equivalence relation where 0 is equivalent to 1. Furthermore, in the Trivial Ring (that is, the ring algebra of a single element) the multiplicative identity (written as 1) and the and the additive identity (written as 0) are the same element, and thus in the context of the trivial ring 0=1. Isn’t that fascinating?