MotoAsh

lol well… not exactly what I meant, but OK.

You do point at yet another problem with the idea, though: Not all “unpopular” opinions are bad opinions, and exposing everything for judgement all the time would only further promote same-think under capitalism.

Oh I’m not sorry for their consequences. That doesn’t make removing all privacy a good idea.

Though think of privacy as offering a feeling of safety. We wouldn’t know they literally said they love Hitler if they wouldn’t have felt safe enough to voice it. They didn’t think it WOULD be leaked. They just knew their opinion was gross to the mainstream.

I’m SURE you have said many things the mainstream would call gross. Maybe not necessarily hateful and vile ontop of that, but gross and ostracizing worthy to some none the less. Would you be OK with people ostracizing you for less than what they’ve said?

Would you have said/done those things if you knew it could be looked up by your name?

It’s by definition not private if others can just look it up. I’d say no. Nobody deserves to be judged by their employer or others for EVERYTHING they do or say. Everybody has a bad day sometimes. Everyone gets really annoyed and says mean stuff.

Furthermore, privacy has profound mental health implications. People that cannot get privacy develop mental disorders like paranoia, anxiety, self-doubt, and all sorts of other problems.

On top of that, if they knew their messages could’ve been leaked… do you think they would’ve said it in the first place? They WOULD be thinking it, but you wouldn’t know.

Invading everyone’s privacy because you don’t want to have to exercise your brain is a terrible thing to ask. To those of us that do know how to observe and think, it’s pretty damn obvious when someone is a pile of crap like these people. Removing ALL privacy just so dummies can agree is… one of the worst possible reasons to remove privacy.

There is a diffuse gamma glow around the center. There are only a couple of paragraphs quoting the most silly versions of explanations: Dark Matter interaction and spinning neutron stars.

The article offers no answers.

IMO, it’s FAR more likely we just don’t entirely know how dense the region is and what atoms/particles are in it, and it could be as silly as interstellar particles getting excited from high energy particles that escape the SMBH accretion disc. Or some similarly ‘common’ thing.

That is a good scene.

Ehh, wrong movie format. Mostly because by the time someone is literally an enemy combatant, it’s a bit late for words.

Though he has been in a ton of movies by now. If he hadn’t rocketed in to the 21st century by putting himself on ice maybe it could’ve come up.

The irony of your stupidity and judgement in that post is hilarious.

Yea, but that’s infinitely better than WhatsApp where every piece of data is owned by Facebook and sold to every marketing firm in the world and freely handed over to cops.

Why was it exposed to the internet with all ports open? Even Linux is getting hacked if you’re fucking rawdogging every packet that shows up…

(yes I know it’s likely from a bunch of BS services only Windows would be dumb enough to enable by default, but the point still stands that any computer that’s exposed to the internet directly needs to be carefully locked down)

Signal isn’t dodgy like WhatsApp is. It’s just not perfectly anonymous.

lol a minority with the majority of power…

Do you … do you not understand how systemic racism works…?

and it will mean less than nothing to a fascist that doesn’t care about popular opinion. He has his yes-men already, and they’re WORSE than him…

Yea, I agree in the general sense, although you will always have something akin to countries so long as the entire world isn’t literally communist. Thus making the distinction rather pointless.

No shit. Nowhere did I say you’d convince a bigot with these arguments, especially bigots as committed to the bit as Israelis…

BTW, if you think Palestinians are a majority in relation to Israel and the other nations involved in that conflict, ESPECIALLY in power, then you are only exemplifying your lack of understanding of how the real world works.

Your glee with engaging with your own ignorance is just pathetic.

rofl way to say you don’t understand how the world works without just saying it.

It has never existed and cannot exist next to capitalism. You are making MANY mistakes with your asinine post.

China isn’t not communist because they engage with capitalism… They’re not communist because their entire system isn’t communist…

When there’s one party, one ruler, and one set of people that get to rule over the rest … that’s specifically NOT communism.

Even if they didn’t engage with the world market, made every business a coop, they would still not be communist. At all.

That’s why any place with a fucking brain at minimum massively controls the assholes and at maximum puts them to death.

A place that enjoys freedom can exist, but what cannot happen is allowing the greedy assholes to strip away protections.

Though when money IS everyones’ “god”, the rich and greedy are more divine than us plebs…

In before the tankies try to claim China is totally seriously communist, no really.

It seems you’re making the oppposite mistake retard conservatives make, by pretending that actual communism would be so bad if it even could exist in a world dominated by capitalist global trade.