What kind of rat is fine with scammers?

No echo-chamber is stronger for it. It’s a weakness.

Removed by mod

Again, quoting the article, it says that many students (although maybe not most) will graduate without an understanding of these three subjects.

How can that be considered a positive, and what’s even more; acceptable?!

What the hell are you talking about!? It says in the article that these three subjects have been moved out of mandatory learning.

Meaning that most Indian students won’t understand the basic principles of evolution or the most simple understanding of the composition of elements.

Not considering either of these three to be essential mandatory learning is insane.

Get a grip, dude.

More like Trump, Vance, Trump, Harris, Taylor Swift, Trump, I think my eyes are bleeding…

Maybe, but I’m more thinking you’re too dumb to understand an analogy.

Would you claim the company he worked for has zero understanding of how to do electrical work?

No? He claimed they have ‘zero ideas of how to engineer’ I disagree. I don’t even know what gives me the energy to go against the incessant Elon hate cirkle jerk, but it is so tiresome

I’m not talking about Elon engineering fricking rockets by himself, I’m talking about the dude in the comment thinking that Elons companies doesn’t have an engineering culture that can deliver, which is plain just not true.

I mean hate on the man, I don’t give a damn but don’t be dishonest is all I’m saying

Ok, so another of Elons companies sends rockets to space, so again, they clearly now engineering…

These people have just about zero idea about how the engineering process works, and it shows.

Well, now that’s obviously not true. They wouldn’t have drivable cars if they had no idea how to engineer one…

I never said anything about exactly what makes a good hunter. I was making a counterpoint to the quote of the article

Nowhere does it definitely state that’s the case. In fact, the data doesn’t even support that claim since women should excel at ultra marathons, but they don’t. In fact, women don’t excel in any running exercise that I can find.

Sure. But you then need to show the data that supports those points

I was asking the commenter to explain what a ‘better’ runner is supposed to mean? And tou perhaps was answering something else…

That may be, who knows (without supprting evidence)? But see, things is, I don’t think hearsay is what a good article in Scientific American should be based on.

What? I just looked at the records for ultramarathons, and there is not a single instance of women beating men for their respective runs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramarathon?wprov=sfla1

I just looked at the measured data and came to a conclusion. I don’t even know what conclusion you’re trying to communicate, but it beats me…