OsaErisXero

I’m excited for this to start triggering anti-trust legislation

Please no

Specifically that person probably contracts a law firm to handle the bureaucratic aspect, on an ongoing basis and a support team to handle low level issues.

Cheers, I was getting salty reading the op

He’s downloading cracks or cracked executables

The cracking groups aren’t exactly signing their work with a verifiable public key

They just said they were downloading arbitrary binaries to execute

Sort of. It asks as part of a series of questions on first boot when you sign up for a new account at the same time, but it defaults to yes, so idk if you would count that as opt-out or not.

Bad

It’s rare that the business would give them the slack to be able to, usually there’s plenty of intent

Questioncore, lemmypunk

Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

If ace combat has taught me anything, it’s that there’s no reason we can’t do both

This is not precisely accurate. These are individually addressible and can be commanded to change what’s displayed based on any arbitrary input, such as detection of a critical mass of apple products in that part of the store, or a device which is signed into a store account on the store app, accurate down to about 3 meters last time I looked at the state of presence analytics tech. So you absolutely could have 20% higher prices follow a person around a store if you wanted to.

I’ve only ever seen it when running a game or when a chromebook got plugged into a 5w charger, so I’m guessing it’s when the OS does the math and decides it can’t rev down enough to make headway while booted up.

iirc, there are currently 3 charging states: Fast, Slow, and Low Power Charger, which already covers your cases, so I would argue just moving the bar between low and high up is probably enough.

It makes me wonder how many other people back out after hearing that the job is on-site. And it makes me wonder why this wasn’t specified in the job description

They’re trying not to get filtered by having it listed as on site up front, and banking on people saying “well, I’m already foot in the door i guess i could settle” once the interview process starts.

Won’t somebody please think of the shareholders

A lot of risk narcing on someone irl

I would imagine a production version of this would have predefined cut lines to pull a chunk out for working on stuff in or under the foundation

Well, so much for that