I must be missing something. Firefox only shows me a ‘add to home screen’ option but not an ‘install’ on my phone. Is there some sub menu setting?
Edit: these same options below are the way it presents for any known web-apps enabled site.
Some dingbat that occasionally builds neat stuff without breaking others. The person running this public-but-not-promoted instance because reasons.
I must be missing something. Firefox only shows me a ‘add to home screen’ option but not an ‘install’ on my phone. Is there some sub menu setting?
Edit: these same options below are the way it presents for any known web-apps enabled site.
The one I own, people get upset when I take theirs.
I’m of mixed opinions on it generally but like the web-apps where you go to a site and then ‘install’ it. My mixed thoughts are because it seems to only work in chromium browsers rather than Firefox, but it’s a nice way to get a custom configured app on the spot.
About 700 watts, it makes for a decent space heater in the winter.
Just wait until they start pushing ads onto your vision wherever there’s a blank wall…
Like others said, self signed or internal only domains work. Really though for the minimal cost of generally less than $20/year you can make it a lot easier by just buying a domain.
From a pure security stance it could be argued that a personally owned CA is more secure than any public one since it’s possible for others to create a trusted cert with a public entity. Cloudflare ends up doing that for any domains you register with them, but that’s really only an issue for things facing the web and using self signed certs will typically cause problems for any pre-compiled client apps you might use.
My two main boxes are split to be storage vs compute. The NAS box has a minimal CPU and a pile of 3.5 drives for the low cost storage and they hypervisor has all the CPU and fairly small storage.
Basically the goal in my setup is all the working data is in one place and the handling in another with various snapshots and RAID mixed in to avoid the risk of “oh shit did I just…?” situations.
So anything that could be called bulk data gets offloaded to the NAS directly via mounts and any cache/working data is held locally. If your lab space grows to a notable level over time eventually you need to consider disk I/O as part of the design and having the bulk data on another box let’s you effectively trade some network load in for disk load.
That’s a big part of the appeal of the fediverse for me. Setting up a personal site used to be fairly easy, but was largely isolated and unidirectional. With the AP protocol, and frankly a lot of self-hostable apps in general these days, you can make something to converse with the whole globe and you don’t even need to make a big effort to help people find it.
Webrings still exist, but finding them is less than trivial when they get drowned out by the noise of corporate sites. I’ve used IRC within the last year, but had to look up the proper use of nicserve commands. The old web mentality is still out there, but for the major part people want simplicity. Few want to go through the learning curve to deal with some of the more esoteric parts of it when they can just auth into a site and do a thing.
Sounds more like war on a bunch of legacy regulation that needed to be updated requiring their use.
An absurd amalgamation of a 4 part while house filter, a softener, and an under sink reverse osmosis thing for drinking water.
The water here has enough dissolved solids in it that before I put in that stuff if the pipes got a pinhole leak in them it would seal itself within a couple hours at the expense of everything having a white crust on it.
There was a question posed about 60s flower children and such a bit ago they had someone saying they were one, so somewhere 70+ I’d guess.
Removed by mod
Right, and there are more types of liability than an employee’s action…
https://www.northernbrewer.com/products/draft-brewer-flex-keg-system
Something like this is available from a lot of places, just gonna cost.
Why? Because it creates a separate entity. If you where to hypothetically clone yourself, should you be responsible for the actions of the clone? Perhaps more directly, assuming you work for someone, should the owner of whatever place your work for be personally/individually responsible for your actions?
That separation is created because otherwise nobody would ever employ anyone if their employee’s actions could get them sued personally.
The company doesn’t have ‘less’ liability, it has separate liability.
You wouldn’t expect that you would be responsible for the actions of a roommate in most cases. Creating a business entity separates the business from the person running it. The taxes are separate, the owned properties are separate, the liabilities are separate.
Say you own a small restaurant, The building it resides in (if you owned it) is owned wholely by the company. You also own a personal residence. Now a customer comes in and suffers some injury and they sue. They would sue the business and if it all went badly for you they might take ownership of the business assets including the building it’s in. They could NOT however come take your personal residence that’s not property of the business.
If you tried to do some shady biz and change ownership of the assets away from the company before a judgement was made then the customer could feasibly ‘pierce the veil’ as they say and include you into the suit personally.
Invader Zim might fit the bill here. Created by a guy who also made a comic called Johnny the homicidal maniac
If he has x-ray vision shouldn’t he just be seeing a bunch of bones or other dense objects not penetrable by x-rays? Can it be shut off? How? Are we sure he wasn’t responsible for a drastic rise in cancer rates by going around just blasting everyone with his radiation vision all day?
Well we had to make enough for a whole party. The salt was just a bonus knowing no true Brit would ever let seasoning get near their meal.
Blocked as in sites reject traffic, or blocked as in can’t connect to the VPN?
The former is on the far end and not uncommon. A lot of sites reject connections from known VPN endpoints because the same tunnels that provide privacy to you also provide privacy to attackers quit often. You just need to decide if the site is important enough to use without a cover.
If it’s the latter, that would be a near end issue and would likely be your ISP or someone nearby that is looking to control your traffic.