May you please make one argument after another, or just one please.

The only argument I can reconstruct out of your brainfart could be “Capitalism is good because North Korea has no capitalism”. Just because (their own) people say its not communist doenst mean it is. Or do you really think they have no (ruling) classes, no money?

Does NorthKorea not strive for “interests” (word is misleading us normal people btw, as its not yours/ours but the interest of ruling ones) of nationhood? So extending borders for example (as they are currently actively in war with South Korea under cease-fire)

its not individuals, its systemic.

unless we change the game, there will be no “good” result, no matter if red guy, blue guy, green guy or whatever.

(Capitalist) Nations in competition are the fundamental issue for ever-returning crisis based on fundamental (scientifically analyzed) contradictions… …Capital and Labor (one side wants profit, the other wants fair wages), … Usage and Exchange value (things are meant to be useful, but are sold primarily as commodities), …Production and Consumption (too much is produced, but many - and an increasing number - cannot afford the goods). …Competition and monopolies (everyone fights for market share until a few dominate everything) .technological progress and job losses (machines replace people, even though the economy is growing)…

capitalism

thats like the concept of buddhist reincarnation, there is no “soul”, ego is illusion in buddhism

like a stream of consciousness constantly travelling through cycles

I still havent gotten a response from the site owners why I got completely removed (ip-ban)

Last thing was me arguing with a mod about the reason I got sub banned: me simply commenting “source:[tabloid’s name]” under a news post that was baiting incitement. they claimed I was derailing when the whole post was literally just the blog post of that bad faith tabloid in a rather “serious” sub /de XD

its a joke of a platform that carefully fosters a gullible army of bootlickers it seems, at least to me being left on read like that

Imo the two party system basically always devolves into two pro-authoritarian parties, sponsored by capital owners.

like I’d say the “democrats” are just a GOP-light version in terms of representing and realizing progressive topics. Even in parliament systems I feel like this is an issue, greens become more and more conservative in some countries, and esp a certain middle-left party, I have in mind, is basically just doing what the conservatives want with no own agenda anymore… so in 2 party systems this overton-window shift seems even easier to establish idk

the price is the necessary parameter in the end. oil is plenty and will always be cheaper. as someone said above: burning is the issue

I mean it depends on the uses. Esp sitting in a chair (also with my more cozy cotton pants) often or other sweaty conditions, it can be like once a week, but also if it passes the smell test and there was no dirt-event it can also be idk, once a month?

so anwser probably would be like ~20-30 times a year, why what about you?