That’s like asking if I can resist reading a book. Sure I could, but I want to read a book - why would I resist?
That’s like asking if I can resist reading a book. Sure I could, but I want to read a book - why would I resist?
They actually did:
The Voyager team sent commands over the weekend for the spacecraft to restart the flight data system, but no usable data has come back yet, according to NASA.
Unfortunately, that didn’t help. So now they’ll have to find out what’s causing this, and then see if they can fix it.
It’s linked to your account. If you view YouTube without logging in, you should have no issues. You can use the Multi-Account Containers extension to log in selectively per tab, if you need to.
Ah, so blog authors will still need to enable it manually. That’s a shame.
What does “blocked on the search engine” mean?
That doesn’t seem to mention Microsoft Clarity, other than it being on the list of domains that its ad blocker (not its search engine) blocks?
What I’m assuming happens is that no way is fool-proof, so they managed to limit the amount going into the USB port, and they’d be able to limit the amount going into the jack, but not by enough to tip it over the edge of the rating.
My guess would be that it’s one less hole that water/dust can get in?
Could you also replace the screen, camera’s, USB port, loudspeaker and earpiece with nothing but a screwdriver?
Copying my reply to this same point from elsewhere:
Those phones were presumably glued together and not as repairable as the Fairphone is. Which is very useful, but does lower your waterproof rating, hence the need to compensate elsewhere.
I really feel like people are too quick to assume malice, generally. Often, there are just trade-offs with no clearly-right answer, and it’s not obvious to folks like us on the outside what those trade-offs are.
Hehe thanks, I’m not a fan of watching videos, but I understand you don’t feel like rehashing the points here either :)
Those phones were presumably glued together and not as repairable as the Fairphone is. Which is very useful, but does lower your waterproof rating, hence the need to compensate elsewhere.
I really feel like people are too quick to assume malice, generally. Often, there are just trade-offs with no clearly-right answer, and it’s not obvious to folks like us on the outside what those trade-offs are.
Would be helpful if you could share why he was against that idea.
You can also buy a cheap USB C-to-headphone-jack adapter.
The main reason they did it is to get a higher water-proof rating, making it easier to last longer.
Hehe, I can be more explicit: why would Chromium “resist” MV3 when the Chromium developers are the ones pushing it?