amio

Disproving them can work

No

So don’t?

Then what’s your counter?

Arguably best way to counter misinformation is non-platforming it. Mere provable facts and impeccable logic have a dogshit success rate.

Ha! Get rekt, Meta.

… OK, but seriously, what the fuck is it? Marketingspeke is cool (apparently), I get it, but what does it literally do?

“Finally”? Barf.

I’m seeing a lot of uncited claims. If these are just conjecture or opinion you could be clearer on it. If they’re not, citing sources is probably a good idea.

It’s very human, that’s why it happens everywhere in history and also in at least like 4 or 5 different places right now.

We’d like to think we’re nice and rational and empathetic, but we’re just not as a species.

I think the idea of having instances own communities is fundamentally flawed. Discoverability is one of many ways that fucks things up.

Because what is legal and not does not involve all that much logic.

I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist, but that’s just peanuts to space.

Damn Brunhild, that’s just like her.

Probably not. But from their POV it’s at least a competitor, albeit an insignificant one, and pushing too hard to “let people know” is… pretty much spam. They’re used to handling spam and have mechanisms in place (fewer now, though. snort.)

yadda yadda didn’t read :)

deleted by creator

Rekt

… but no, no, I’m sure the ban was due to the relationship advice. 8)

That makes sense. For some reason, I thought it was something like “no reason to do what I did”. So basically “Sure, totally no ulterior motives here, by the way!”, which seemed kinda weird to me.

“Ah, {countryName} switched out their authoritarian ruler for someone who thought FNV’s Caesar’s Legion were a pretty cool bunch.”

Do you happen to know why it’s “keine Ursache”? That is a thing in Danish and Norwegian too (“ingen årsak”) and I always thought it was a weird phrase.