The guy already gave his statement at a deposition. Why on earth would they kill him after the fact?

Ah, a classic correlation is not causation situation. Thanks!

So would you say that vaccines are still needed for all, or just for people like me who are immunosuppressed?

Of course, if you’re not getting an actual pay rise. Then you strike until you get a better deal or start making money without exchanging it for units of time.

Ok just going to make the counter argument if that’s ok?

They are new compared to traditional vaccines like polio and smallpox

Their view is that vaccines are now unnecessary because of herd immunity, (I’ve got them to concede that hospitals or the economy would have collapsed without vaccines), and that they are just being used up because govts signed contracts.

Their view is that the side effects risk is now higher than the benefit.

Unfortunately I’m at the age where more friends are dying than I’m making new ones lol

Thanks, that’s what I thought. They always point to the recorded side effects and I always counter with the fact that the disease is a lot lot worse than the cure, and that it’s a classic trolley problem. If the equation is kill one to save a million, you always kill one.

Or am I missing something?

Inflation means money is worth less than before and inflation is actually money creation. Higher supply means lower demand. Record profits are only records because the nominal value is higher, but the real value isn’t.

Companies operate on gross margin, so 30% margin is always 30% of the total price. The actual value is irrelevant.

The for dummies books are good if they don’t want to learn online

Doubt

Pocket and IFTTT?

Apparently, people creating new accounts seem to assume the word (password) in the box in light gray font is a suggestion rather than a label.

lol

Yes but. Spreadsheets used to be done by hand, yet we still have bookkeepers

Thanks for posting, I’ve been looking for a no code option

The whole industry is toxic, mentally and environmentally.

Blog

deleted by creator

Ah ok. Yeah they just did a thing to replicate it recently. Not sure if that means there was a period when that ability was lost though

https://dpnetwork.org.uk/international-data-transfers-data-bridge

Ok, I think I get where you are coming from, but your conclusion still doesn’t argue the original point imo.

The GDPR law on the UK statute books is the exact same law as the EU one, it has not been amended. It’s just that the ECJ is no longer the highest court. The UK supreme court is again supreme following brexit.

Please provide an example of where the EU has taken action successfully against a conpany that has no base in the EU though. I’ve not seen anything like that bef

The original point was that the UK was somehow in a worse position because of brexit, this is not true. The UK is no weaker legally because of exiting the EU. The law is identical.