Looks like they got that number from this quote from another arstechnica article ”…OpenAI admitted that its AI Classifier was not “fully reliable,” correctly identifying only 26 percent of AI-written text as “likely AI-written” and incorrectly labeling human-written works 9 percent of the time”

Seems like it mostly wasn’t confident enough to make a judgement, but 26% it correctly detected ai text and 9% incorrectly identified human text as ai text. It doesn’t tell us how often it labeled AI text as human text or how often it was just unsure.

EDIT: this article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/openai-discontinues-its-ai-writing-detector-due-to-low-rate-of-accuracy/

Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term

That’s the open source life though :/

Almost nobody gets rich from open source. You’re explicitly granting rights that people usually pay for.

It’s noble, but it sucks.

That took time though.

Ssh only started getting major industry support after heart bleed and it’s been the go to secure shell for at least over a decade before that.

That’s nice, dear

You have no idea why? Really? It’s to get people thinking about / trying bing.

It’s all advertising.

We’re going to enter another search engine (read chatbot) war.

Governments like to assume that once something is illegal , it’ll just stop within their borders

I don’t think you’re right about nvidia. Their hardware is used for SO much more than AI. They’re fine.

Plus their own AI products are popping off rn. DLSS and their frame generation one (I forget the name) are really popular in the gaming space.

I think they also have a new DL-based process for creating stencils for silicon photolithography which, in my limited knowledge, seems like a huge deal.

Yeah but the headline should let me know what the story is and make me interested. Not make me think the author is complaining that their SSD died.

I don’t care about that. I don’t want to read an article about that.

They should’ve made a better headline

Idk all the details of the current wotc controversy train, but If an AI generates a base image that gets refined by a human, is not that human-created?

Plus like you know that $60 isn’t for the art or the time it took to make the art. It’s for the Dnd brand.

They’d charge $60 even if it was made in an afternoon

But…. Isn’t most art made on computers nowadays?

TFW you realize not everybody accesses lemmy the same way

Don’t look at political communities

They can switch to a continuously charging “usage” based model for insulin, the same way GPU time is rented out now.

any big Pharma people here. I’m available for hire btw ;)

That’s not true. IRC is a client-server system. Your messages go to a server and are “relayed” to clients.

It’s not a p2p messaging system

Okay, buddy

So first, you don’t know my age. Don’t be weird.

Second, just because you ran a personal site without ads doesn’t mean ads weren’t part of the internet…

I’m not saying ads are perfect, but they’re not the thing that’s strangling and ruining the internet. They’ve always been a part of it.

But also like any website can run arbitrary code like that. Most ad platforms don’t allow their customers to just have arbitrary js.

Big surprise, people do things despite not being paid for them!

Also a UBI should be just enough to live (afford food and shelter) wherever you live. Then you can work for more.

UBI is about freeing people from having to work multiple dead end jobs just to survive and enables them to have an actual pursuit of happiness. Not everyone will want to work harder, but the option opens to those who do.

Currently if you’re struggling just to pay for food and shelter, it’s incredibly hard to spend time developing skills needed to make more.