

The idea isn’t to let sites restrict adults, just let them restrict kids. So there wouldn’t be a child internet.
Programmer from New England Projects
The idea isn’t to let sites restrict adults, just let them restrict kids. So there wouldn’t be a child internet.
By litigate I mean, if a person is creating something and says they don’t plan to distribute it, do we take their word for it?
If it ends up getting distributed anyway, should we take their word that it was an accident?
We consider people’s private data important enough that if you leak it even by mistake you are on the hook for that. You have a responsibility.
I think that rather than framing this as something harmless unless distributed and therefore intent to distribute matters, we should treat it as something you have a responsibility not to create because it will be harmful when it is inevitably distributed.
How do you litigate ‘intention’ in this way?
Warzone 2100 was my jam! They hadn’t actually got cutscenes working in the Linux port I was using so I was.very confused about the story.
Termux used to rock but nowdays installing stuff is very hit or miss.
x86 apps? Awesome.
Reason. It’s got a unique workflow that is hard to break from. I even tried Renoise, but it’s hard to switch.
I personally like FastAPI (python.)
I think that’s up to device vendors giving parents decent controls and parents monitoring their kids devices. Which is admittedly not great, but still better than the honor system and more reasonable than submitting your license.