Any progress does that. The issue is not that there’s less work, the issue is that capitalism makes that into a bad thing.

Less work should mean more leisure, more time for hobbies and passion projects, not reduced living standards.

Wrong, the science community is slowly switching to bluesky

They follow robots.txt

There are different kinds of AI scraper defenses.

This one is an active strategy. No shit people know that this costs them resources. The point is that they want to punish the owners of bad-behaved scrapers.

There is also another kind which just blocks anything that tries to follow an invisible link that goes to a resource forbidden by robots.txt

Exactly the same here. I went Nexus->Pixel 2->Pixel 6

Works flawlessly, except of course that I only get like ~28h of battery life instead of the ~48h in the beginning

The article also mentions Cisco briefly, who also suck. Almost as much as Palo Alto

It was poignant, and you reacted to it like a sore loser, so yes, it was objectively clever

No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.

Whoever dies first loses.

I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that’s not that far-fetched

Weird how he’s helping the far right in both cases.

• complying with Erdogan
• refusing to block fascists

Did you know that you can click the headline to get to an actual article that you can read, which answers this question?

Negative rings are a horrible proprietary liability.

That’s been clear from their inception, and this changes nothing.

Try spending a new year’s eve in e.g. Germany.

everybody above the age of 15 can and will start fireworks in close vicinity to everyone else doing it. You do not feel safe.

Doesn’t apply to the author here, so I don’t understand why you brought it up?

They accepted one that adds gender neutral pronouns in more than one place instead lol

It’s how dishwashers work: more cycles = more rinsing, then later rinse it all off.

You could do a quick pre-wash, then a long cycling of water, and lastly a rinse with clean water.

That’s the last three words of the article. The author didn’t miss the connection either.

I always wonder when people repeat something from the article or ask a question that’s answered in the article: did you not read it or did you just want to start a discussion about this connection and are somehow constrained in the number of words you can write per day?

Testing superscript syntax: 10^-9

10^-9^

That cis women playing against trans women is unfair. As said above, the actual data proves that this is not the case. Of course it’s undeniably true that reactionary dudes (and maybe even women) feel like things are unfair, but the actual facts invalidate that feeling.

The discretized, simplified middle school biology you’re invoking here is simply not a precise enough model to depict reality.

Trans women aren’t “male” from a muscle development perspective, as they don’t have a male hormone profile lol.