• 0 Posts
  • 281 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • called a video game, but I feel like that’s for lack of a better term

    Its the perfect term for it, your definition of “game” is likely incomplete:

    A game is a structured type of play, usually undertaken for entertainment or fun, and sometimes used as an educational tool

    Note that it’s usually for fun, but does not need to be. Flower is a game by that definition. ETA: I also actually had fun playing Flower on my Vita back when it was new so…

    Adding “video” to it is probably the weaker part of the phrase, “digital” is probably more accurate but I doubt people are going to change terminology like that for something so minor


  • My wife and I will cuddle up most nights to continue q show we’re watching, we finish WWDITS (finale just aired) and move on to something else tonight

    Though our “TV” is my local Plex instance running stuff I request through Overseerr rather than even the normal streaming platforms, so I have a much better experience than those provide

    As for news and the like: YouTube, specific creators like the daily show or journalists I know have actual merit, and my local station through plexs live tv







  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldAre you in support of UBI?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    If so, what’s the purpose of the money?

    Barter and trade will always be part of humanity unless we somehow manage post-scarcity. Money is so far the best way we’ve found to manage and track the value of things for that system.

    If people are choosing to buy things, that’s a free market

    No, it’s just a market, and even then that’s not a guarantee at all. It could be that people just trade money for valuables amongst themselves, or other systems I’m too stupid to conceive of

    If people are forced to buy specific things, it’s not really buying

    Yes, it is? Its only not buying if you don’t trade money for it, ie the government sending it to everyone for free

    If people are free to buy certain things but new people aren’t allowed to enter the market with new products, that’s just worse than capitalism.

    Good thing that’s not anyone’s suggestion







  • Ask a quantum chip how to cure a disease?

    No, that’s not how that works at all

    You really think the chips actually understand diseases?

    Nope

    We’re gonna end up with a whole new generation of people that have no clue how the shit works to begin with.

    Projecting? Its very clear you have no idea how this stuff works, that’s for sure

    Granted that AI and quantum computing aren’t quite the same thing

    They aren’t the same at all

    Future generations will have the ability to just ask a computer how to generate cure a disease

    Almost certainly an impossibility


  • Why do we humans even think we need to solve these extravagantly over-complicated formulas in the first place?

    Because those questions could do things like cure disease or help us better understand the universe or a million other things

    Shit, we’re in a world today where kids are forgetting how to spell and do basic math on their own, no thanks to modern technology.

    Not because of it, either. This research isn’t really related to that kind of tech, either

    Just because we can, doesn’t necessarily mean we should. We’re gonna end up with a new generation of kids growing up half dumb as a stump, expecting the computers to give us all the right answers.

    This isn’t going to be for daily normal use, you’re projecting fear at the wrong tech