The guest VM requires TPM to install Windows 11.
It depends on your hypervisor platform. Some platforms can enable vTPM (emulated TPM) without host hardware support, like KVM with swtpm.
Hyper-V can do passthrough TPM or emulate vTPM but still require the host to have hardware TPM enabled to do so.
No, your guest VM still requires TPM enabled
That right there might beat Microsoft and Google name changes combined
Yes, that one too! smh
Their enterprise products as well. Azure is now Entra, all the admin page rebrandings like defender, purview, intune, the URL changes, etc.
Please just stick with a name already!!
Yes 100%
And it’s my favorite tea.
Yeah and they didn’t perform the same tests on any iPhone model.
I know…how to prompt?
This is the way
RSS is really great, always has been. And many sites support RSS, not just for a main feed but also sub topic feeds.
I use NetNewsWire on iOS
VoIP systems are getting us closer to your example. Properly provisioned VoIP (on-prem or cloud) can take a SIP user which looks exactly like an email address and direct digital calls to a physical phone. These days it’s likely going to be sent to an office desk phone or a Teams user, but many years from now it will likely be more common to dial out like that from/to any phone device.
I think your example is a bit more nuanced in that there’s some sort of regional database that I suppose one could register for when they change their address. But I don’t think we’re moving in that direction. Things are moving in a decentralized manner and folks hold onto their digital identities, regardless of their geographical location. So like others comments have said, the phone book system is not evolving any further, because modern communication systems are already the evolved version.
This is awesome.
The multi xxxx registration is god damned mad lad max level.
Every time you speak it’s like an episode of Columbo
Yeah, true. But that’s cool. Having choice like that is great!
But I suppose that’s the issue. Trying to keep signup simple to help drive user engagement. How much do you try to wrap someone’s head around such nuanced differences, and when do you say “just join me on my instance”?
I’m on three different instances and the sort by All-hot feed is nearly identical.
I’m not on Beehaw or Hexbear, but those instances make it pretty well known they block a lot of other instances.
Very strange, but glad you worked it out!
I’ll keep this thread in mind if I ever run into something similar.
Well, dig is available also of course, but nearly all distros still include nslookup despite it getting deprecated. I like the simplicity of its interactive mode.
Host is also really great with more human-readable output.
Don’t get me wrong, when things are getting hairy, you’re going to make a lot of use of dig. I just find that most troubleshooting can be taken care of a lot simpler with host or nslookup.
nslookup is available on macOS and most Linux distros as well (and very helpful indeed).
Yeah if you can dig a record and received a response it’s not a routing issue.
But aren’t you on the same subnet as your DNS server? There’s no routing happening if you’re on the same subnet which I was assuming.
Even through dig defaults to outputting A records when no other options are specified, I would use the A option anyway just in case:
dig @192.168.0.249 study.lan A
If you use “ping study.lan” do you see it output the A record IP address in the first line of output?
Did you try using nslookup as I described?
lol, this is fun