

This is what basically worked a few years ago. Massive mess, a huge pain, but it worked.
This is what basically worked a few years ago. Massive mess, a huge pain, but it worked.
Tech has made things more efficient - the rewards of such are simply being funneled from the average person to the wealthy.
…no, they won’t know for a few hundred years due to the actual speed of light and vast distances of space.
He, Andrew Ferguson
He has stated intentions to ease his predecessor’s scrutiny of business mergers and acquisitions, while continuing critical oversight of big tech platforms.
Expect continued increased in costs if goods.
Yup, that he is anything but a downgrade from Lina khan for consumer protection in the FTC is super wrong.
Yes, quantum entanglement occurs without the speed of light, but we famously cannot interpret information from it faster than the speed of light - it isn’t FTL communication.
That’s also pretty true for people, unfortunately. People are deeply incapable of differentiating fact from fiction.
It is definitely picking up very quickly currently. Far more common in the last couple years than before.
I can put my credit card number in any transaction directly, and so can anyone else. Digital payment can provide a random one time card number (at the expense of privacy, admittedly). Physical cards are absolutely not safer.
… Sodium Ion are already being sold in EVs.
This is apples to oranges. Fusion is not the same as fission. We simply don’t know the economics of a viable fusion reactor.
However, we do know fissions cost is heavily driven by safety and regulation. It is very reasonable to assume that fusion’s requirements in this area are distinctly smaller.
Except most people are not going to tolerate having a multiplicity of apps, and if people in your circle don’t already use signal, they definitely won’t now. Whereas previously, I was getting pretty decent traction from people slowly adding it.
Being vegan is absolutely not worse for the environment.
This is not the function of the phone.
The body positive movement is a non-variable in practice. This is simply a continuing trend of decades of poor diet and little movement.
You made a generalized statement about carbon capture, which is unfortunately absolutely a necessary step we need to take.
Trees are not the solution. The forest is the solution.
… Which is more reason to invest in carbon capture.
Meh, please don’t quote unusual statistics without giving any context for how to interpet them.
For this value, it is calculated by:
24.3% is not that out of the ordinary - you can see historical data back to like, 1995 here.
Not saying this stat is useless, but the way you’ve chosen to use it is intentionally and inaccurately inflammatory.