Reading the paper, exercise alone had no effect on these “biological clocks”. So, the results are promising, but given the lackluster results of the trial on other outcomes (blood pressure, mortality, falls, etc.), I’d be cautious before jumping to conclusions.

I think the main question is how exercise alone compares to exercise +supplements. If I have time later I’ll try to dig into the paper.

dupe

When you’re a government, you need a little more process to ensure things are done well (moderation, security, …). Even something simple like that could take valuable time from quite a few people.

Sad but unfortunately fairly justified. Hard to justify spending public money on 3,500 users.

Just because it’s dangerous and not always fun doesn’t make it a “mission”. Exactly like when some rich schmuck pays 150k to climb Everest.

Can we stop calling it a “mission”? This is an expensive vacation for billionaires, not a scientific endeavor.

How do you explain that amyloid-targetting therapies are seeing some success, even if limited?

I’m not sure but I think some of these drugs can make permanent damage.

Obviously survival remains the topmost concern, but thinking about side effects sounds like the logical next step now that we’ve made tremendous progress with survival.

Never seen that banner or an ad. I guess it’s just a matter of time though 😕

I don’t understand why they don’t use a second model to detect falsehoods instead of trying to fix it in the original LLM?

I wonder what the impact on piracy will be? It’s probably harder to rip streaming services than it is to rip blu-rays…

As an AI model, I cannot answer duplicate questions. Please check this completely unrelated question instead.

I’m not equating guns to phones. I’m showing that the argument about “digital education” holds no water.

So, should guns be allowed in schools, along with “good gun education”?

Smartphones serve no real purpose in school. Why allow this very problematic device that is not conducive to learning and tends to cause problems outside the class, too?

Smartphones are orders of magnitude more distracting than whatever existed before. Also, you can teach digital literacy all the while forbidding smartphone use outside of class, there is no real opposition there.

All of this is just noise designed to keep us talking about the site. You could call it bad advertising. We should stop feeding the troll.

Exactly, they’re trying to kill the competition but they’re obviously not going to damage their business.

Great idea! Just subscribed :)

I don’t agree that this is the real deal

What I meant is that we finally have a disease-modifying drug for humans. It opens a lot of possibilities. I do agree though that benefits for the patient are limited for the time being (unless we can prevent Alzheimer’s for pre-symptomatic symptoms, but that remains to be proven).