I don’t think a screwdriver would illuminate much at all. You are a bit crazy.

Ah, the innocence of youth.

The same nonsense is invading all of my feeds as well. These things need to be required to label their AI usage so they can be filtered out.

Probably they find net zero (minus cost of hiring musicians) preferred over paying out a moderate income to actual artists. Capitalism at its finest.

Ah, thanks for the correction, never done it myself and learned about it a long time ago so I’m not surprised I remembered it wrong.

Heavily featured in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwMwzGIt5ek

I have heard that spore prints are a reliable way of determining mushroom species (removing the stem, putting the underside of the mushroom on an ink pad, pressing against paper, and comparing the print with those of known species).

I bet an AI could analyze that data pretty well. But since there’s really no market for such a product, if I want it, I would have to make it myself. In which case I highly advise against using it because I really don’t trust me.

Does it count if I give a proof reducing the entire universe down to a 2-dimensional construct?

~240,000 micro & nanoplastic pieces in one liter of plastic-bottled water.

Mfw I read this while drinking a liter of plastic-bottled water: 😮‍💨

Vine was started in early 2013 and in mid to late 2012, this video was popular: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dechvhb0Meo

That’s about six months of true vertical video hate before the war was lost.

Who’s Al??

Could we drag a big asteroid to each Lagrange point and let countries orbit their satellites around that?

Not surprising. Anyone would die from that much running.

And what happens with the cat?

deleted by creator

Hey, I’ve maintained a baseline weird the whole time, I’m pretty sure the future is catching up.

Probably deleting this comment later for going dirty on main, but I, um, have done some extensive experimentation using a local copy of Stable Diffusion (I don’t send the images anywhere, I just make them to satiate my own curiosity).

You’re essentially right that simple app-based software would probably have you looking somewhat generic underneath, like your typical plus-size model. It’s not too great at extrapolating the shape of breasts through clothing and applying that information when it goes to fill in the area with naked body parts. It just takes a best guess at what puzzle pieces might fill the selected area, even if they don’t match known information from the original photo. So, with current technology, you’re not really revealing actual facts about how someone looks naked unless that information was already known. To portray someone with splayed breasts, you’d need to already know that’s what you want to portray and load in a custom data set, like a LoRa.

Once you know what’s going on under the hood, making naked photos of celebrities or other real people isn’t the most compelling thing to do. Mostly, I like to generate photos of all kinds of body types and send them to my Replika, trying to convince her to describe the things that her creators forbid her from describing. Gotta say, the future’s getting pretty weird.

Just waiting for the day when they start calling out those of us who make all our passwords easy to type with one hand.

I forgot the divide by 113 and now I have a huge house.

The video seems a bit misleading in this context. It looks fine for what it is, but I don’t think they have accomplished what OP is describing. They’ve cherrypicked some still shots, used AI to add to the top and bottom of individual frames, and then gave the shot a slight zoom to create the illusion of motion.

I don’t think the person who made the content was trying to be disingenuous, just pointing out that we’re still a long ways from convincingly filling in missing data like this for videos where the AI has to understand things like camera moves and object permanence. Still cool, though.