Username checks out.
Username checks out.
if I pirate a movie and then only I watch it, I don’t think anyone would really think I should be arrested for that
There are definitely people out there that think you should be arrested for that.
Neither of my last two phones came with a USB-A cable, nor did my wireless mouse or keyboard. The flush Qi 1 charger doesn’t even work because my camera bump is too big. Also, from what I’ve heard Qi 2 should produce far less heat while charging, which makes Qi 1 worse for battery life.
Sure, I could “make it work”, but I’d be happier with two electrical outlets or even nothing than the basically useless wireless charger and ports I have now.
Agreed. My work desk is barely four years old, and already its integrated USB-A ports and Qi 1 charger are outdated and basically useless to me. I’d prefer not having them. The power outlet is still fine though.
I’m an inbox zero person. Other mail clients like Gmail and Outlook allow you to snooze message threads.
Snoozing means that you hide the message until a later time/date when you will be able to act on it or answer it. When you snooze a message you choose when it should reappear in your inbox.
Proton has previously stated that this is a planned feature.
Between the VPN, the email, the password manager and their cloud storage, I feel like I’m easily getting my money’s worth. The second they add snoozing to Proton Mail, I’m moving away from Gmail completely.
Avelon shows both as strikethrough.
Using AdGuard and Vinegar to use YouTube in Safari, I can’t remember when I last saw an ad. It’s not ideal, but it works well enough.
Not at all. That’s the joke.
This. I’m visually impaired and actually need a lot of light to operate normally.
At one point in my life I lived in a large building where all the hallways were operated by infrared sensors. It was honestly pretty cool to just walk around and get the light I needed without pressing any buttons.
I’ve often thought about how neat it would be if we could do same for outdoor spaces.
No, their point is valid. You just did a bunch of mathematics while completely ignoring the larger issue of corporations and rich executives wasting money on frivolous endeavors.
Not only that, you literally suggested that dividing the BlueJeans money among the poor of the world would do them little benefit–as if Verizon is the only company perpetrating corporate greed–which they never suggested.
Using your own numbers, $3415 dollars would probably make a huge difference in most Verizon employees’ lives, but instead they spent that money on BlueJeans, a product that any reasonable person could have told you was doomed to fail.
Hope this comment wasn’t too long for you.
deleted by creator
Would you then class the pages upon pages of generated, useless content I get for most Google searches nowadays as “black hat” SEO?
Where i live, Organic Maps has way better walking directions than Google and Apple Maps, and it’s a lot more respectful of privacy than at least the former.