

Maybe AntennaPod is for you: https://antennapod.org/
Verspielt verspult 🧑💻
Maybe AntennaPod is for you: https://antennapod.org/
It’s terrifying to see it visualized like that.
Edit: I thought this is about data and not the storage media itself lol.
Obvious answer: It depends.
One individual can have TBs of storage assigned to them, like a cloud storage with years worth of high res family photos or videos, or TBs worth of… homework and Linux distros. This would be nearly useless / cost more to gather than it has a value.
On the other hand, a group of people can have mere kilobytes of text messages between them that is potentially worth millions of dollars stored on a server, like trade secrets or war plans.
A special case to consider: The data of John Doe type individuals I described first can be a valuable asset too if its not one individual but a big accumulation of thousands / millions of people, especially of they can be made comparable to one another. We see this in advertising and will probably realize this value more and more in crowd surveillance and control / opinion making. Especially if all of this data gets analyzed and reduced to machine readable tokens, possibly even on the users end devices, which means the data gets more valuable and more compact at the same time.
My final answer would be: It effectively ranges from negative to positive millions / billions of $ per any given unit.
I don’t know what you are using the card for, but I don’t think you will be able to saturate that pcie5 speeds. In gaming and everyday usage at least you won’t be able to spot the difference.
Therefor we got Finamp now, which is really good and about to get even better.
Those do not have to cancel each other out necessarily. The open and modular design of Application APIs in AOSP lets the user decide which way they want to interact with the devices they own compared to the walled garden. Graphene does an excellent job by leveraging this design with further encapsulation while focusing on baseline compatibility and keeping up with google. Sadly the last one is a difficult task, so some features may take their time, while others we may never see.
That’s interesting. Apart from the pathfinding, Osmand behaves kind of sluggish for me and I had to get used to the UI/UX which can be overwhelming at first (even for tech savy people). But therefor its also a lot more sophisticated and feature complete which I also like.
To each their own, maybe even both ;)
Organic maps is the best alternative I could find. It’s on Accressent which you can get from the GrapheneOS App store. All the maps you want are downloaded to the device, no need for network access afterwards / continuously. Pathfinding is fast compared to e.g. Osmand. It’s pretty barebones though.
Thanks for the great writeup! Some of your Issues may be fixable, others stem from the fact that its sadly an alternative OS developed by a hand full of people compared to a multi billion dollar corp. But trying out new things and seeing true progression in development can be exciting too / make up for the inconveniences. In the long run this project can’t stay dependant on google, since they make their money from data and not hardware, and one of GrapheneOSs main purposes is to remove that source of income i guess. Also google is known to kill their products out of nowhere. Anyways:
Could be a great opportunity for MLC Chat, which uses OpenCL.
Or forbid network access in graphene os
Just checked and i guess you’re right! Time to do some distro hopping again lol.
Not the heroes we deserve, but the ones we need.
Would be great to see some major distros shipping with KDE by default. Fedora e.g. had this idea a little while ago.
I was just trying to say that i hope that the creators of custom roms will still be able to do their work, which i don’t take for granted. Google doesn’t make their money with the phones themselves but with the data they get from the os thats running on them.
I wonder what this will mean for custom roms. Mediatek are among the only chipsets with available microcode and therefor e.g. supported by OpenWRT, which gives me hope.
To me this is a feels like a full blown release as I’ve been using the beta, alpha, the builds on a fork of one of the maintainers github fork, … All of them with very few issues.
That was honestly the only thing i needed from a launcher when i got my pixel 6a two years ago, but there is so much more to it as i later discovered. All the tweaking that is possible on top of the (very good) pixel launcher, which it was built upon but had this one flaw.
That looks amazing but 7 hours on a 16000 mAh battery seems a bit low
I used a raspberry pi 3 with RaspAP in this use case in my room at home for some time. Performance was not the best, but enough for my needs back then.
Make desktop go cube brrr