The most recent Intel Core 2 Duo was discontinued in 2008. I doubt Intel would be able to convince anyone that this is a competing product or would cause any customer confusion. No one is going to be looking for a low end processor from over a decade ago and accidentally buy a watch.
- 0 Posts
- 25 Comments
Does it use just standard watch bands? It looks like it, but I didn’t see it mentioned.
One of the things I find ridiculous about other smart watches is that they use proprietary bands. When I found out that people are paying $60+ for a silicon band for an Apple watch, it blew my mind. Also that people put screen protectors or cases on their Apple watches because their $500+ watch doesn’t even have a crystal lens, and is prone to scratching.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldtohomelab@lemmy.ml•RAID or Backup? What do you think would be more appropeate for my use case?English31·4 months ago2 disks in the same machine is not a backup whether the data is copied between them using RAID or rsync or anything else.
Sounds like for this machine, just use the two disks in RAID1, or a ZFS mirror, or something. And figure out something else for backups. Probably a cloud solution.
Also, RAID2 requires a minimum of 3 disks, and is rarely used.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Wubuntu: The lovechild of Windows and Linux nobody asked forEnglish431·5 months agoJust use KDE?
It is just KDE though. Its just a plasma skin. But what you get by installing Wubuntu instead of a proper distro, and then applying a skin, is supporting a developer with a history of bad security practices and poor behavior. Not to mention the potential copyright issues. This whole project will probably die when Microsoft realises that someone is using their name and trademarks to sell a competing project.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•I wish all food could be as good as pizza.English10·5 months agoQuiche is just eggy deep dish pizza
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•The EU proposal to scan all your WhatsApp chats is back on the agendaEnglish7·5 months agoEven if you have 100% confidence in your own provider, you also need 100% confidence in every other recipients provider, which is basically impossible.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What was cancelled or discontinued that you wish wasn't or that they brought it back?English10·5 months agogone downhill imo since the Nexus 6
Nexus 6 was released October 2014. That same month, Moto Mobility was sold to Lenovo. So its not just “in your opinion” that was the start of the reduction in quality of the Moto brand.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Does anyone else feel like tech peaked around 10+ years ago?English312·5 months agoIts called enshitification. Its a process that’s been happening in all areas of tech for a while now.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Several countries have their own Do Not Call registries that opt you out of telemarketer lists and it only takes a few minutes to complete.English131·6 months agoPretend you are running a scam call centre. Wouldn’t you like a curated list of known real phone numbers and names of people that are likely to answer their phones because they are used to only getting legitimate calls?
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Several countries have their own Do Not Call registries that opt you out of telemarketer lists and it only takes a few minutes to complete.English254·6 months agoThese list also make you a likely target for scam calls.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Ask Science@lemmy.world•What is a *salt* and what is a *bleach*?English1114·6 months ago
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Despite tech-savvy reputation, Gen Z falls behind in keyboard typing skillsEnglish1·8 months agoWALL-E
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Despite tech-savvy reputation, Gen Z falls behind in keyboard typing skillsEnglish9·8 months agoTo be fair, they changed it in the last couple of years. It used to be that you held the power button to power it off. Now you have to hold the power button AND a volume button for some reason.
With open source firmware. Preferably QMK + VIA.
rImITywR@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Linux May Be the Best Way to Avoid the AI NightmareEnglish1109·11 months ago“The Year Of Linux on Desktops”. Been hearing this for decades, but it might actually be happening.
Been hearing this for decades.
What you’re talking about is usually referred to as a de-orbit burn. Sure somebody could call it a reentry burn, but not SpaceX. What SpaceX calls a reentry burn is the maneuver when a Falcon 9 booster lights its engines as it first hits the atmosphere to slow down and move the heating away from it’s body. Neither the super heavy booster nor the ship make a maneuver like this.
IFT3 did not make a de-orbit burn, and there is not one planned for IFT4 either.
IFT3 was technically suborbital, but only barely. Like a couple hundred km/h short. Literally a couple of seconds longer second stage burn would have put it into a stable orbit. Or the same velocity just with a lower apogee. They intentionally left the perigee just inside the atmosphere so a deorbit burn was not required. This is also the plan for IFT4, iirc. I think they are talking about the bellyflop/suicide burn. It was not planned on IFT3, but is for IFT4.
Both the booster and the ship have attitude control thrusters that you could see firing during the live stream of IFT3. Early prototypes used nitrogen cold-gas thrusters, but were planned to be upgraded to methane/oxygen hot-gas thrusters at some point. I don’t recall if/when they were.
the explosion, which took place at its Boca Chica Starbase facilities
The raptor testing stand at McGregor experienced an anomaly
Well, which is it? I’m going to trust NASASpaceflight over this article and go with it was a McGregor. No where near Starbase. And that means it will likely have no effect on IFT4 as this article says.
edit: Adding to this, the author of this article has no idea what they are talking about.
The Raptor engines that are currently undergoing testing are SpaceX’s Raptor 2 engines
So clearly nothing to do with IFT4, as Ship 29 and Booster 11 are already outfitted with their engines, non of which are Raptor 2s.
On its last flight test, IFT-3, Starship finally reached orbital velocity and it soared around Earth before crashing down into the Indian Ocean. On the next flight, SpaceX aims to perform a reentry burn, allowing Starship to perform a soft landing in the ocean.
IFT3 burned up on reentry, maybe parts of it made it to the ocean, but it was not crashing into the ocean that was the problem. IFT4 does not plan on doing a reentry burn. No one does a reentry burn from orbit. Starship uses a heat shield like every other orbital space craft. They are planning to attempt a landing burn, that is probably what they are talking about.
Should the role of government be to say:
Or
I tend to think it should be the former. As a Canadian, we have a federal election coming up and it sucks that there is no (relevant) political party that shares my opinion.