Why not both?
std::vector ulUtil {"GNU", "Alpine", "BusyBox", "Toybox"};
int currentUtil = 0;
do
{
try
{
OS(ulUtil[currentUtil], "Linux").use();
}
catch (USER::Bored & err)
{
currentUtil++;
continue;
}
}
while ((currentUtil < ulUtil.size()) || (findMoreUtil(ulUtil)));
Debian for work.
EndeavourOS for home usage.
kdesrcbuildRecommendation for NAS: Debian of course. Choose hardware a few gens older though.
If you have old laptops, use OpenSUSE. It should be fun
Unless you have what it takes to be a celebrity
radio waves are magic, and the higher in frequency you go, the darker the magic gets
People getting isekaied: Me gonna get that magicks!
But we have Magic at home! Also Black Magic!
Interesting. Guess I need to check out its UI.
And make sure never to copy that
I remember someone in the Uni hostel having a similar problem.
All they could do was change the jumpiness in their device. It worked though.
Always love to see others making nice house-wide setups.
Maybe someone else griefing because I downvoted some comment of theirs?
Maybe they have Voter ID turned ON, on their server
You just went over 9000% instead!
fancy ASUS router doesn’t have any way
Maybe it’s just the ATPC, that’s why they thought they didn’t need to add the setting.
Mine is a pretty old, cheap 2.4GHz only model from the days when 5GHz had just entered the market.
Sha-ring is Ca-ring
Well, now you do!
I’ll consider myself having done a good deed today :P
I would assume yours does have ATPC, specially if it is an 802.11ac or later standards compliant.
I don’t have much space I roam around in and there’s mobile internet for the mobile anyway.
It was completely unusable. Everyone was jamming everyone else.
The companies deserve all the flak they get in this case. They know it is congested because they are the ones who did it, but don’t care to think about it.
The least they could do is to let the user change the settings, but “oooh nooo PICNIC!”
Ideally they should use a WiFi analyser while setting up the device and if there are too many APs of their own company, send a report to their nearby office so that it can be rectified.
I don’t downvote my comments.
Unless someone proves my comment to be a bad one in a reply and I consider my comment to have been wrong. (That happened once on Reddit)
I remove the upvote so that when I open up my history, I don’t feel weird with everything being blue. <- also, you would probably find my second reason in a previous comment somewhere else
just to power through the interference from other apartments
Yeah, it would have helped for your neighbours to have reduced their power a bit.
I just keep it at the lowest power (20%) and am right now getting > -50dB (5 bars).
Of course, if you are doing it for the efficiency, you will also need to make sure that your receiver is not having a hard time with the low transmit power.
So, not caring, definitely works.
Yes!
The one I bought, doesn’t overheat even at 100%, but the ISP one used to overheat even with the WiFi off.
On the other hand, I recently tried connecting my router directly to the ISPs network (trying to lose the NAT) and it was hanging every few minutes. I was running Wireshark and unable to configure it to get internet access.
I would consider the main reason for overheating to be internet traffic, but in some models, the WiFi makes the difference to.
I’m pretty sure none of my neighbours is techy enough to even know about WiFi Analyser.
Also, it’s not congested enough yet.
Maybe if someone were to be making a 2.4 GHz receiver as an amateur project, it would matter.
I just like keeping it at a minimum, thinking that maybe it would reduce noise for others. Not that it really matters to anyone. Just a “feel good” thing.
So you mean there are laptop USB ports out there without current limiters?
I would want to check my PC’s ports, but I am not filthy rich, so I’ll just assume stuff is not current limited.