It’s a joke

deleted by creator

The irony of this comment is you can find the cooking show but not Westworld on HBO lol

I don’t think they’re saying that method would yield 100% clean data but it would give you all the “necessary” data with the absolute bare minimum storage requirement. At some point people will log into their email and for most people if you have their email password you have the password they use for everything

Execs are no doubt panicking because the infinite growth they’ve promised as a result of their 2020 finances is starting to look unlikely and they need excuses to cut down on employees

The buzzword stablecoin sort of lost its luster when all of those stablecoins crashed at the same time as the unstable ones lol

The irony of tagging and asking a bot this lol

Ya I appreciate the gesture but if this truly is the “biggest” robocall racket I have to imagine a 300M fine is a dropping the bucket

Ya that website is totally useless if you don’t already know what Pleroma is, it explains what the fediverse is like 4 times but never explains how the app integrates with it lol

“Oh boy the line went up that must mean I’m on the winning team!”

The problem is that without an effective way to ID bot content then stats like this could be covering up the real trends in human users, particularly in any stat that purports to measure all lemmy instances since we already know there are instances out there filled with thousands of bot users

How many people do you think are on lemmy compared to threads lol

The “too good to be true” sell and complete lack of detail / pricing on their website is sketchy imo. I’m immediately suspicious of any org that profits off of piracy in such an opaque way

This is exactly something an engineer who works at Google would want to work on, finding new ways to enrich Google is literally their job and there would be great personal benefit from coming up with the best way to implement this DRM crap for profit

idk if you came up with this but I expect to see this joke a bunch more in the coming days lol

https://i.sears.com/s/d/pdf/mp-tc/10095033/prod_12149315612

Page 10, the term LEGO must always be followed by a descriptive word

idk why this is on a sears website but I’ve seen similar style guides before

ackshually the technical plural is “LEGO bricks” or “LEGO elements.” Referring to the bricks as LEGO is considered as incorrect as LEGOs

I’m glad this community is following in the tradition of the reddit one, ugly graphics that communicate nothing useful yet somehow get upvoted to the top

Go bald early and you can look the same for decades lol

“Thanks for the F-Droid”

• Dirty Mike and the Boys