well. as another said, one is pretty unique the moment they seek online privacy. this is the sad reality of it. You want to blend in, less unique? Ditch privacy is a way to go. Is this a shit choice, of course it is. The otherway around is embrace the uniquess on every refresh of the page. However, I still have a hard time to beat some very sophisticated fingerprinting engines. Or you can disable Javascript and you won’t be fingerprint-able at all along a VPN.

It can still tell you’re on Linux via WebGL

Less unique is equal to what majority of other’s do.

So

• Windows
• Chrome (stock settings, maybe some addons like grammarly)
• No VPN

SEPIA

I always want to try it but never. Form the docs it seems a complex, no so plug-and-play system.

TL;DR: The UK OSBA strikes again.

Edit: l long thought it were named Bill, not Act. Sorry for the confusion.

Wait. If this exception get adopted, does that mean one can pirate everything and use “AI training data” as a perfect defense? People doesn’t even need to have any hardware, thanks to cloud computing. All the proof you need is you used or intend to use said data for AI training purposes.

It is working so well that I get an infinite loop of it on the same page.

Except many services are very aggressive to Tor exit nodes, namely Google and Cloudflare. Everytime I just met with CAPTCHA after CAPTCHAs, and eventually I gave up on the site.

Yeah, I should cut ties with Google but cutting YouTube on NewPipe is hard. I’m on Proton and watching YouTube is already hard.

I will just get an AMD (7745HX?) mini PC with adequate RAM and call it a day. It should run almost anything that you throw in a light setup with minimal power usage.

I’m curious why he still carry all those things after he is done with it.

It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

IMO the correct use of AI in searches is keyword correction and suggestion, like a beefed up version of “do you mean”.

Which I do specified “in the broadcast domain”. Sure you can use it with VLAN but that more than the scenario I’m describing.

Didn’t they already done such thing before?

It doesn’t matter. Port configuration can switch around and the bottleneck is still there. Traffic with in the broadcast domain (i.e. subnet) will handled by the switch alone.

There is WiFi onboard so it can have some actual benefits, depending on design and how user access resources, but how likely you’re going to saturate that 1/2.5G link? Not even you stream some 4K movies from Plex to iPhone will does that.

That’s the only use I can think of but I don’t know if OpenWRT support VLAN cuz I never used it directly.

What’s the point of having 1G on WAN and 2.5G on LAN? Traffic won’t hit the LAN port until it’s routed to the Internet, yet the WAN port is the bottleneck.

Edit: Seems like I switch up the port speed but my point still holds as the bittleneck still exist.

I highly doubt if they really live stream the video you took, or pictures. I would much rather believe an OCR is being done locally and send it to a server for translation.

Wouldn’t DNSSEC makes the whole poisoning moot?

It is a straight downgrade. The day you forgot to bring the dongle you are stranded.