Any Amazon drivers here that can give some insight into this?

Yeah believe it or not the term “monopoly of power” doesn’t come up in US schools lmao.

Here gunshots just means someone is drunk (US city).

Gunshots? Where do you live that that’s not a regular thing?

This makes sense for devices like Google home where there is only one activation phrase but I don’t understand how an IC could exist that can respond to custom activation phrases.

Also are you saying that cellphones have this circuit too? I’m pretty darn sure that’s all software based.

How are they listening for the activation phrase then?

You don’t need to transmit the recording. Maybe not even a transcript. Just the keywords.

I still have my old Ubuntu CDs no need to worry.

You think those people get paid a living wage?

Nah. Money is not in military contracting at all.

The arts lol? Nothing but debt.

They aren’t. It’s a waste of time to say things like “if republicans really believe X they would Y”. They just say the right words. None of the words reflect what they believe.

He can obviously do whatever the fuck he wants. This unfortunately isn’t even a reasonable question to be asking at this point.

I like both games but this is subjectively true. I think a lot of people would find the art in Mindustry a lot easier to look at.

It’s the color palette. It’s genuinely terrible. The pixel art itself looks pretty good but those colours just kill it.

Edit: god damn UK phone… color not colour.

Please don’t post ads here

Well one is about money and the other is about art and culture so idk if they are really the same thing.

It can be a political decision tbh.

Companies will never be able to stop this,

If they have their way they will. All the tech bros are pushing for trusted computing platforms.

Imagine a world where most/all computers are as locked down as an iPad. That’s what they seem to want.

If you mean the Monty Hall paradox, this is how I’ve recently been able to understand it.

You start with a 1/3rd chance of being right. That’s a 2/3rds chance you are wrong. Your first pick is likely wrong.

The host now must open a losing door. Since you likely already picked a losing door, the host likely only has one option for which door to reveal.

So since chances are best that you first picked a wrong door, then the host picked the other wrong door. Which means the one that hasn’t been picked by anyone yet is likely the winning door.

Edit: Monte Carlo paradox is a thing. My bad.

The gambler’s fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy, occurs when an individual erroneously believes that a certain random event is less likely or more likely to happen based on the outcome of a previous event or series of events.

For this one I like the example: “The surgery fails 9/10 times. The last 9 patients have died. Does that mean you in the clear?”