Started my transition 2021 (holy fuck that was a long time ago?!)

There is no right answer, nor does your answer have to stay the same.

There’s a lot of processing that comes with this. I wouldn’t recommend burning photos, but maybe putting them in a box where you no longer remember they exist.

I started wanting to burn it all, but I find myself wanting to show that pretransition me live, rather that disgust now days. It’s still me, it’s still made me who I am, but just like I’m no longer 14 year old me either, I’m no longer that person.

Yeah my goal was wired for this reason.

I’ve worked on Bluetooth as a developer and good lord it needs to burn in a fire.

That question is what brings me here!

I’m thinking of doing a soundbar and subwoofer in the living room, sound bars alone in each bedroom and some bookshelf speakers in other rooms

It misses where apple brought back audio and magsafe

Audio is valid, but apple brought back magesafe.

EDIT my 3 year oldacbook pro has bothagsafe and 3.5mm audio.

Except devices, specifically quoting routers, Do make up bot nets

That’s the specfici malware used on unsecured IoT devices and routers.

I was able to find tons of scholarly articles Like this one

That specifically talk about how many of these devices get comprised.

This isn’t some theoretical attack vector. This is active now.

The risk of taking down large portions of the internet has the same risks as a vacuum? Interesting.

Your right not every device has parts availability. But again, why not? Because it it’ll cost more?

Your willing to risk tanking the digital economy for what has historically been huge sums of money, because we don’t hold vacuum cleaners to higher standards?

I’m being obtuse, but you keep pointing to “well we don’t fix that problem over there, so we shouldn’t do it over here”. It doesn’t sway me. We should absolutely fix repability of ALL ELECRONTICS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

We do take cars that fail safety inspections off the road. You are correct, we don’t hold them to higher standards, but that’s not a reason why we also shouldn’t remove genuine hazards off the roads.

If a car is far more likely to kill someone, it shouldn’t be on public roads either. Just like devices that can’t be update don’t belong on public nets. The risk to the broader public is to big IMO.

Software 100% needs to be included in support.

Old devices that become vulnerable but still accessible on the internet, eventually become part of bot nets producing DDOS and other network attacks.

You think spare parts don’t cost money? Wearhouse space is expensive. Massive part stores have to be made. That’s all expense needed to take on by auto manufacturers. Why would software be different?

Either that or they keep all the tooling, which again is expensive. And people need to know how to use the tooling too.

This isn’t a “it’d be nice” kind of patch. This is exactly how we get massive bot nets for DDOS attacks. Devices become vulnerable, scans go out on the internet looking for devices they can exploit, and when they do, they gather bot nets.

It’s also not creating something new. It’s fixing your shit. They don’t have to create the entire software stack from scratch, just fix the exploit. If they can’t reasonably do that, then these devices need to be taken offline.

This is why a number of countries have laws saying spare parts must be made available for a number of years past being sold. Well beyond what the warranty is.

How is this significantly different?

I’d recommend you sign up for their mailer. I don’t have the link off hand but it shouldn’t be hard to find.

Can you at least see how both statements are whataboutism?

Yes that should be more talked about. So that makes this article invalid?

Again, ghost is actively working on this?

So two things

Activity pub is federation. So you’d be publishing to anywhere. Which as I said before, ghost is actively working on. They have a weekly mailer.

If your looking for an algorithm publishing centre, your going to find open source to be lacking. Generally speaking people who are looking for open source, don’t want the algorithmic feeding that your describing.

I self host ghost but they do offer a hosted version. It’s open source as well. They’re even working on activity pub integration!

Except this whole article doesn’t apply to android. Android AFAIK has 0 announced plans to do this. So why is it a concern?

When it comes to iPhones, it’s not a shouldn’t, it’s a can’t.

The way iOS limits background process means you can’t. I develop for iOS apps for a living.

There’s still you should never under any circumstances allow unsupported devices to be exposed to the internet or any way. Because that’s how we get bot nets causing DDOS attacks.

An iPhone is not going to be that. This isn’t phones in general doing this, just iPhones.

There are also far more efficient devices for that. More cost effective and more energy efficient.

I understand wanting to reuse old devices for something, but there’s a limit to what is power efficient as well.