• happydoors@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 days ago

    The computer or spreadsheet idea is a bit ridiculous to me on account of even ancient humans could devise the same method in a smaller scale without the backbreaking 5,000 holes being dug. Every other idea presented by the article makes sense to me.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Ancient humans were kind of known for building things big af though. Pyramids, petroglyphs, henges.

      Khufu’s pyramid has like 2 million blocks. 5000 holes is a rounding error.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Unless ancient humans were all Matt Parkers, it makes no sense to me that they’d make a gigantic counting system.

        “Hey, we have 6 more livestock now”

        “GATHER THE MEN, we’re adding rocks to the hill!”

        • teft@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’re talking about a time that could be pre-numbering system so instead of “i have 6 sheep” it’s more like “I have this many sheep” and you point to your hole which has 6 of whatever the thing is that they were using. maybe kernels of corn? Then you make sure you have one kernel for each sheep. But I’m just guessing.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Those were big because they had religious meaning.
        That is very different from an accounting system, that is supposed to be practical.