• Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s funny that even even if the weight was distributed equally by population (it isn’t), it’s not based on number of people voted. so, in theory if only one person votes, their vote still has the same weight as the whole state.

      That’s my understanding anyway.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also to clarify further, the founding fathers created the EC specifically to override the popular vote, because they were afraid that land owning men might be too poorly educated to actually make decisions about our “democracy.”

      Really let that sink in. They probably would have opposed the expansion of voting rights to anybody.

    • Vlixz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      What a weird system! Is there a specific reason why the US decided to do elections this way instead of just using the normal tallied vote count? This just adds a huge layer of complexity to the elections - you’d think they’d want to keep it as transparent and simple as possible.

      • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        The copout answer is “Back in the day it made it easier to do federal elections since the US is so big” afaik

        Tho really it’s just hard to change, the democrats are lazy/don’t wanna rock the boat, and the republicans benefit from it and are also evil