Is Hyundai bringing its most affordable EV to the US? For the first time, Hyundai’s Casper Electric was spotted driving on US streets. Will the low-cost EV launch in the States?

After opening pre-orders for its smallest and most affordable in July, starting at just $23,000 (31.5 million won), the Casper Electric is already Hyundai’s best-selling EV in Korea.

Hyundai followed it up by launching an even cheaper Casper Electric Premium model, starting at $20,000 (27.4 million won). With subsidies, Hyundai said the new compact electric SUV is available for as little as $7,300 (10 million own).

According to Hyundai, buyers are flocking to the new EV thanks to its “ample driving range” and low starting price.

The Casper Electric is rated with up to 196 miles (315 km) driving range in Korea. In Europe, the mini electric SUV is known as the Inster EV. It starts at under $27,000 (25,000 euros) and has WLTP driving range of up to 221 miles (355 km)

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This could be a game changer if it’s sold in the US.

    According to Wikipedia this car is made in South Korea. Sounds like it charges about as fast as a Chevy Bolt.

    “There is an on-board charger which accepts AC power at up to 11 kW; the vehicle also can connect to a DC source at up to 120 kW, at which rate either battery will recharge from 10 to 80% in 30 minutes.”

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are those Hyundais with that battery subscription stuff or are they a all in one, one time payment?

    • cron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would surprise me if there was a battery subscription, at least none of the articles mention something.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s low cost because it siphons user data to sell to corporations

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s been looked into. While they are all doing that, they’re getting stupidly little money for it. Not near enough to subsidize the cost of the car.

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t get why they are doing it then.

        I really want a dumb car, it only needs a forward and backward gear, it needs a speedometer and a battery indicator and maybe a AC. Nothing else.

        I would pay more for less shit inside the car. A car that can be remotely controlled is horrible.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh so they’re invading their driver’s privacy and selling the information to pretty much anyone just for a few bucks then. The stuff they’re doing can be life ruining.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    the byd seagul EV is half this price and with similar specs; calling this hyundai low cost feels farcical.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tbf China has a lot of problems with subsidies and labor rights, so it makes sense for Hyundai’s stuff to be more expensive, but yeah I doubt it’d lead to double the price.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only half the price if you compare it to the price when sold in China. When the dolphin is sold in western countries like Poland they go for €30k. Which means this is even cheaper than the dolphin.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        that’s the price i would pay if my government didn’t impose tariffs to prevent people from buying them.