• moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Also it’s 100k hours combined use over 50 printers at once, not one printer for 100k hours, which would likely be much more problematic.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s some serious click baiting. Naturally you can’t run a printer for more than 8760 hrs each year, so 100k is definitely of a hint. But then at least try for 12 printers instead

      • Atlusb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Correct but it does show their manufacturing is fairly reliable. I’m not for them for their attitude rather than their quality.