Wahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 hours agoFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up182arrow-down11
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phWahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 hours agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·7 hours agoSure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
minus-squareicecreamtaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·4 hours agoFood companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 hours agoI mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 hours agoEither it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 hours agoEither it’s perfect, or it’s not worth improving. Do you hear how that sounds?
Sure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
Food companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
I mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.
Either it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.
Either it’s perfect, or it’s not worth improving.
Do you hear how that sounds?