What matters is how this affects enforcement.

Lol sure destroy all the trust with your users THEN launch an email service. Hard pass fro me.

I guarantee you they’re already planning to train an LLM on everybody’s emails, or at least sell them to AI companies doing training.

ez pz:

#!/usr/sbin/nft -f
table inet filter {
    chain input {
        type filter hook input priority raw; policy accept;
        iif "lo" accept
        ct state established,related accept
        iif "enp1s0" udp dport 51820 accept
        iif "enp1s0" drop
    }

    chain forward {
        type filter hook forward priority raw; policy accept;
        iif "lo" accept
        ct state established,related accept
        iif "enp1s0" udp dport 51820 accept
        iif "enp1s0" drop
    }

    chain output {
        type filter hook output priority raw; policy accept;
    }
}

My new strategy is to block EVERY port except WireGuard. This doesn’t work for things you want to host publicly ofc, like a website, but for most self host stuff I don’t see anything better than that.

IDEA: an AI that crawls Street View, ranks addresses by ease of break-in, and generates plans for pulling off heists.

Pretty much: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commits/trunk/

Source?

That’s a gimmick that doesn’t justify the costs of switching from Git (IMO)

If you want decentralized collaboration features in git without using forge software, you can use mailing lists like the Linux kernel does.

Anyone have the story behind this? Fuck Microsoft and all that, but Github has historically been pretty good when it comes to not banning people for stupid reasons. Usually, it’s a DMCA thing or a valid security threat.

Recently, there was some controversy about closed source code powering a component of the project (https://github.com/orgs/organicmaps/discussions/9837) but I didn’t keep up with that. Could this ban be related to that?

That is peak clickbait, bravo.

For the past like decade the only “updates” OpenOffice has been getting are questionable code comment changes from one dude. These changes literally do nothing, and people have suggested that the only reason he does it is to make OpenOffice seem like it’s still being developed, even though it was abandoned long ago.

Why? IDK, but I think it’s just some stubborn asshole with an axe to grind with the LibreOffice project. OpenOffice still has stronger name recognition than LibreOffice, so a lot of people still use it.

You’re looking for enemies where there are none. I’m not a medical professional, but I assume this amount of paranoia is not good for your mental health and well-being. Just take the article for what it is: a win for free software

Do people use Facebook for porn? Like, on their personal accounts? That’s weird.

I want to celebrate this, but it’s hard not to see it as an attempt at authoritarianism. I think the right way to do a Facebook ban is to ensure people have access to a good alternative (like Mastodon) before pulling the plug.

University degrees are a dime a dozen

Not true. This lawsuit has been in the works for a long time. IIRC the investigation started towards the end up the first Trump admin, was completed, brought to trial, and won by the Biden admin, and now is being completed under Trump again.

Don’t believe the MAGA lies about government agencies being partisan hacks. They’re generally staffed by people who believe in the mission and put that ahead of politics. Under Trump, a lot of good people are leaving, but the ones playing the loyalty game can stay and keep working.

Apple seems like the best option due to their business goals (privacy).

Lol. Lmao, even.

Sorry for the flippant comment, but it’s so incredibly wrong that I need to highlight the ridiculousness. TBF to you, it’s a common misconception due to Apple marketing’s lies, and our regulatory agencies unable/unwilling to do anything about companies that lie like Apple does.

Microsoft would be even worse.

The best outcome IMO is to kill Chrome, Edge, AND Safari, and force users to scatter and find an alternative on their own. There will need to be some way to prevent all big tech from trying to compete here too (Facebook, Amazon, etc), as those are incentivized to monopolize exactly like Google did, and we shouldn’t have to wait another 2 decades for the government to do something about it.

There will be some growing pains as people initially end up on shitty/scammy browsers, but eventually the market will do its thing and browser devs will compete for marketshare.

Are you a software engineer? Without doxxing yourself, do you think you could share some more info or guidance? I’ve personally been trying to integrate AI code gen into my own work, but haven’t had much success.

I’ve been able to ask ChatGPT to generate some simple but tedious code that would normally require me read through a bunch of documentation. Usually, that’s a third party library or a part of the standard library I’m not familiar with. My work is mostly Python and C++, and I’ve found that ChatGPT is terrible at C++ and more often than not generates code that doesn’t even compile. It is very good at generating Python by comparison, but unfortunately for me, that’s only like 10% of my work.

For C++, I’ve found it helpful to ask misc questions about the design of the STL or new language features while I’m studying them myself. It’s not actually generating any code, but it definitely saves me some time. It’s very useful for translating C++'s “standardese” into english, for example. It still struggles generating valid code using C++20 or newer though.

I also tried a few local models on my GPU, but haven’t had good results. I assume it’s a problem with the models I used not being optimized for code, or maybe the inference tools I tried weren’t using them right (oobabooga, kobold, and some others I don’t remember). If you have any recommendations for good coding models I can run locally on a 4090, I’d love to hear them!

I tried using a few of those AI code editors (mostly VS Code plugins) years ago, and they really sucked. I’m sure things have improved since then, so maybe that’s the way to go?

BMW and Mercedes both supported Nazi’s during the holocaust and I believe they should receive the same treatment but it’s been the better part of a century and they’re still here

If people knew what the Nazis were planning to do back then, they might have boycotted BMW and Mercedes too, strangling them in the crib. Americans know what Nazis are; they were literally our biggest enemy and our greatest military victory, and the vast majority of Americans oppose Nazis. I think the only hesitation seems to be that people either don’t believe Elon actually is a Nazi, or that they think he’s just “TrOlLiNg ThE LiBs!!!11”.

Getting an equivalent car at a reduced trade-in price would cost 20k and I would do it on principle if I could afford to.

That really sucks, and I don’t think you are a Nazi… but you’re driving a BMW in 1933. You’re not going to get any sympathy from people on the right side of history.

That doesn’t matter. You only need to worry about boycotting things within your control, like Amazon shopping and their consumer products. AWS is profitable, but so is Amazon.com.

Buying something at a different store is always a dub even if that store is using AWS on the backend.