Channel 1 AI released a promotional video explaining how the service will provide personalized news coverage to users from finance to entertainment.

    • set_secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t worry they’ve stated that they’ll clearly mark it with an arbitrary symbol, so no one will possibly think it’s the real deal.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The deepest of ironies in a company allegedly made to report “facts”, primarily using artificiality to do so.

      Even if they are completely earnest and honest, the tech they are helping spearhead is going to completely change how information is approached and will be one of the biggest challenges, if not the biggest challenge, we are going to face as a society in a long time. This is really unnerving to watch develop in front of my eyes.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like they’re shooting themselves in the foot with this. If AI reporting gets to a good enough point, people can just have an AI on their phone tell them the news report, rather than a video of an AI giving the report, broadcast from a central server. They will lose their viewers

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The use of unrelated b-roll and stock footage is already a nightmare in this way. One burning trash can becomes the new standard-bearer for any protest they disagree with for the next year or two. Now they can fine tune it to location …

      Honestly, for the news, these sorts of tricks for effect NEED to be clearly and constantly marked during their use. It is actually dangerous the way they currently do it, imho.

      I’m biased enough towards transparency, though I think if they do use AI then they should have to reveal the prompt and model used to make it on top of clearly and constant marking showing it is not actual footage.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This won’t hilariously backfire at all…

      • MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The example where an interview of a victim of Hurricane Ciaran, originally in French, was deepfaked to be speaking English, was pretty scary. Some people will think that it’s just for convenience, but for me, it’s a step too far down the slippery slope. If they were to do the same for a politician, a slight nuance in how a phrase was translated could change everything.

        • Illogicalbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s only a matter of time till someone moves a stock market for profit with a deep fake. If it hasn’t happened already.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah for any sort of interviews I’d rather they kept the current convention of using a voice over, often after a 1-2 second clip of the original audio. It’s obvious that it’s a translation done by the media and not the exact original words of the source

          • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            a leaky abstraction is better because it reveals what is actually happening. That is better to me too. Heck I worry about the voice-overs giving an unfair or inaccurate version of what is being said.

    • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds a bit like the recent exploit for saying a word forever. I wonder how long until these break down and start spewing their source code.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if they’ve learned anything from the infamous Nothing Forever incident, or the infamous Infinite Steam incident, or any of the other various incidents.

  • donuts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wonderful. Nothing will help people differentiate between real, trustworthy news and fake opinion-laden disinformation like AI generated people and content!

    /s for the kids in the back.

  • Kiernian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If they make one of them look and speak like Morbo the Annihilator, I might actually watch.

    Like, with the anti-human sentiment and everything.

    First Anchor: And today, a local law firm files the first lawsuit in a series over a deadly salmonella outbreak linked to cantaloupe.

    Morbo: Next time, we will put the salmonella in more than just the canteloupe.

    or maybe:

    Morbo: Canteloupe tonight, Bridegroom has the runs!

  • vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hello, I’m Eliza Cassan, and this is a Channel 1 breaking news announcement.

    A crackpot video game nerd caused a viral sensation when he livestreamed himself blocking traffic in Times Square, shouting loudly that reality is actually just following the script of some video game from the 1990’s, before consuming 10 vials of Zyme, assaulting a pigeon, and then dying of a heart attack.

    Onlookers reactions were varied, but most continued on perfectly linear paths, walking by the incident without seeming to notice it.

    This segment has been brought to you by Nuke Soda, now available in exciting new lemon-lime. Nuke your thirst with Nuke soda!

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    This felt a lot like Naked News but y’know I’d rather look at titties while being given a bland delivery and near robotic gestures.

    But AI, so I’m sure naked AI news anchors are right around the corner.

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ha! I remember that. I watched it once or twice for the novelty of it. I seem to recall that it was very bland except for the naked women. According to Wikipedia, they are still around and I think that may be more shocking than this AI news.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as news quality goes I think it was actually a good program but the whole “local news” format makes it feel dated and using a green screen 90% of the time makes it feel cheap.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      An you’ll be able to adjust everything…voice, boob size, feminity or masculinity and muscularity.

      Maybe you can make them look exactly like your highschool sweetheart or the lady at the bus stop that you always wanted to talk to. Or for the gay guys and women you can make the guy look like James Bond and he’ll even talk to you personally by first name… Hello there Jonathan, tonight I gotta tell you about this tragic accident at the tallest senior citizen Bolivian rollercoaster… everyone stood up on a turn. Oh, it was horrible as they all fell 23 stories onto the rocky mountain side right through that fresh La Paz air.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Might even be able to adjust the “facts” they say, given a malicious enough company.

        • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably you can set it to Alarming, cutesy, nature news, local mom news, Republican filter, dioses Christian rock band related news. Possibly highschool style news mostly about the hottie you used to like? With proper ads…always Cocaine Cola!..hey Stacey, sho loves it an so should you!

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This tech is going to completely derail communication and discussion in modern society and all people here are talking about is how weird they look or how it’s “the same” as news already. That’s…not great.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, In gonna need names of everyone who contributed a dollar to that before I use it as a news source.

  • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    More and more, the human element is being removed from the news. The most horrific events will be reported by blank-faced robots with no empathy to human emotions, at least in AI channels. Imagine what kind of emotional intelligence future people will have when they constantly hear stories from poker-faced (and voiced) human-like images.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure what idea I hate more: Blank faced puppet cg reporters reciting horrible events, or cg puppets acting sad about their reports. Both are just…not fun.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I think part of this is that the technology is reaching a point where emotion is actually reasonably emulatable.

    • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The voices had a weird pacing, too. They sounded very close to real but just not quite, in an uncanny-valley sort of way.