• essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We really need a compelling alternative to the Play Store, both as users and developers.

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I have it, but I can’t install 3/4 of the apps I use on a daily basis from there.

        • ale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wouldn’t that be the same for any other alternative? That’s what a monopoly does.

        • ale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s valid. In theory, because you’re downloading open source on there, you could audit the apps you download, but don’t know anyone who does that unless it’s their job.

          • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            My main issue is everything signed with the same key, and the way updates can go through without review.

            Obviously Play store isn’t safe or wonderful, but it does have better review policies.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what really, really pissed me off about the iPhone. When it launched and they gave it a desktop-class web browser engine and told people they were going all-in in PWAs (though I don’t think the term existed at the time). Then v2 came out and they went sike! native apps, must be developed on our PCs, must be distributed by us, you must pay us to be allowed to develop, we take a cut of your income, and we’re going to cripple the PWA engine to make universal, open apps all but unusable.

        Dicks.

        • punseye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can PWAs perform just like native apps when it comes to smoothness and optimization?

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, if the underlying engine is designed to support it. There are standard web APIs for accelerated graphics, compute, offline storage, Bluetooth, push notification, environmental sensors, phone book access, camera, local storage access, and so on… A decent PWA is indistinguishable from a native app.

      • Carter@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there any way of “installing” PWAs to the app drawer rather than been limited to a shortcut on the home screen?

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on the PWA, if they have the manifest setup properly it should give the option by itself and even the add to desktop button should change to install the app, but very few sites support it (among the ones I use)

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do love Kotlin, but I work extensively with audio playback on a low level (Oboe, native) so a web app just won’t work for me.

            Also, I can’t really justify rewriting my company’s entire app because I don’t like Google’s monopoly.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you elaborate on “limited”? Surely that is what we want. One of the problems with the Play store is certainly not that it does not have a wide enough selection, but rather that it is full of harmful, hostile, dangerous, exploitive software. Any solution to that problem is necessarily going to limit (or one might prefer to say curate) its contents. That is exactly why I use F-Droid. It is limited to software that is not trying to hurt me.

          • lickmysword@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess F-Droid is limited in the sense of low user awareness? Similar to lemmy in the sense that its just not that popular atm, but maybe its gaining popularity?

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but that’s not going to be helped by making something new that’s “compelling” – which is the topic at hand

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Those products that you “need” to function as professionals are never going to be available in a way that does not exploit you and put you at risk. You’re always going to be trapped with the incumbent marketplace’s shitty practices until you take steps to meet those needs in some other way.

              You do not have to personally audit every application you use. After all, you DON’T audit closed applications, and neither does anyone else. At least with an application with code available under a public license, other people have the ability to review it and raise concerns. I can’t see how you can cast that as a disadvantage, just because you don’t personally want to audit the software yourself.

              Personally, I’m not comfortable predicating my very livelihood on closed, commercial software that somebody else owns and leverages with the specific intention of exploiting me. That sounds like fucking madness to me.

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I get my banking app on F-Droid? How about my home security system app? How about a dozen other apps that I want or need, and can’t be replaced by loading a website in Firefox?

        • butter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is entirely on the companies. There’s no technical reason or requirement for this happening.

          Fdroid works great and is the most likely thing to be adopted, in my opinion. It’s easy enough for anyone to spin up their own fdroid server and distribute their own app.

          If you’re wanting to use a new store, you’re going to have to wade through the growing pains of adoption. It’s just a fact of life.

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m still waiting for Linux on desktop to be a big thing like I thought back in 2004. I suspect the third party app stores will be just as quick.

        • Cris@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, I assume if you install a banking app through Aurora it still works? Totally fair if that doesn’t work for your needs (you kinda need a google account, even if a blank one, to have it work right now) but I assume installing apps through it doesn’t limit them or make them less functional for having been installed through Aurora?

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re talking about stock android having 3rd party app store with permissions to install apps in the background. Yes, you can install f-droid but on a stock android it can’t update apps automatically. It’s not an alternative for normal users. And as long as 3rd party stores are not used by normal users app developers will not care about publishing apps there. What needs to happen is that EU needs to force google (and apple) to allow alternative stores, some heavy weights have to support it and developers need to start publishing apps there.

          • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Droid-ify can install apps in background (or at least without the package installer popup. The main f-droid app is still targeting too low of an android version to do it.

            • ExLisper@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              f-droid can install app in the background on my iode OS. It’s not a technical problem, it’s a legal issue. Google and apple don’t allow 3rd app stores preinstalled on the phones.

              • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thats because the fdroid extension is installed. By default it cant do that. Google added the ability for app stores that target android 12 and above to update apps that also target android 12 or above without the package installer.

  • nope@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Probably not the first degoogled android, but maybe one of the first ‘just works’ degoogled phones Edit: yep I misread but still true

    • Carobu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lineage OS by default comes DeGoogled and works just fine. Both phones I ran it on had absolutely no issues. It must be more niche than I thought though because no one here is talking about it.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At no point does the article claim it is “the first degoogled android”.

      • Captain_Ender@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see the confusion by op. It says privacy-first, as in privacy is its core function not a first in its class. I think they just misread the title.

    • Helmic [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have some deeply tech unsavvy people in my life who will fuck up their phone trying to “uninstall Google” - and thus disable all their keyboards - that would probably benefit from a “just works” degoogled phone. I love GrapheneOS, but it assumes the end user is the sort of dork that is capable of installing it in the first place - people who struggle with tech deserve privacy too.

  • Anti Weeb Penguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I built that ROM back in june and honestly, i don’t recommend it, the interface and apps are just terrible and they take almost a year to release a new android version.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    First up, instead of the usual Google gubbins, replete with the adtech giant’s commercial trackers, /e/OS users will find a set of native open source apps and services Murena has developed to replace all that.

    Murena also bakes a set of “advanced” private browsing features into the OS, including a tracker blocker; a location faking option; and the ability to hide your IP address.

    On the flip side, when all the switches are set to off each one displays a one-word warning — either “Vulnerable” or “Exposed” — giving users a visible nudge to think about how their online activity might be compromising their privacy.

    And this tension between locking everything down (to achieve perfect privacy) and opening select hatches (to boost utility) remains the core confounder for such an ambitious against-the-mainstream-grain tech endeavour.

    The wider question is how much highly motivated demand there is to put in the small amount of extra effort required (and possibly also shell out some additional cost) to tread an alternative, less feature-rich path — if, at the end of the day, all you get for your effect is a product that won’t look or feel especially thrilling.

    So its conviction of where the mobile puck is headed must be that there’s a growing pool of mainstream Android users with an appetite for iOS-style ‘low friction’ privacy delivered outside Apple’s walled ecosystem.


    The original article contains 2,593 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 91%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve actually been enjoying OsmAnd / OsmAnd+, which was recently recommended by someone here. It’s open source and runs more fluidly than Google Maps (which is locked to 60 hz). With that said, it doesn’t have live traffic built-in (and while you can add Google live traffic overlays, it doesn’t seem to get used for routing).

    • danielfgom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think people are going to extremes when it comes to Google and privacy.

      Google has no need to track you personally. They use the location service so YOU can get directions and have a history of where you’ve been, if you want. You can turn this off of course.

      The same with all their other services.

      I’m not saying they are innocent children, for example I don’t like their web tracking tech (cookies, trackers) and I don’t care for ads. Not a fan of them scanning my email either, even if it’s anonymous.

      But you don’t have to use Gmail and your can use as blockers and tracker blockers etc.

      Their privacy settings are quite robust and you can turn anything off your don’t like.

      But they are very convenient with all their services. Having everything synced and available on literally any device is a significant service which is not easy to replicate. Even self hosting this stuff becomes a real pain and expensive.

      I’ve tried ungoogled ROM’s and it’s simply not worth it. A phone without Google services is near useless and much harder to use.

      My neighbour has a Huawei and it has no Google apps and it’s a nightmare to get anything done on that thing. Even something simple like cast to your Google TV is impossible on that thing. He has to use 3rd party maps apps which suck, has no device backup, if he loses the phone he’s lost all his photo’s and contacts and notes etc.

      Basically it sucks.

      Just use full milk Android and be aware of what permissions you grant apps and don’t sideload anything dodgy and you’ll be fine.

      Plus I pay only €20 a year for Google One with 100GB storage which I can also share with me wife. You simply cannot beat that price even if you self host. Plus they backup everything so your stuff should be 100% safe.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google has no need to track you personally.

        ☑ You have no clue about the advertising market.

        • danielfgom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Read carefully… They don’t need to track you personally. Aka there isn’t someone sitting at a pc watching every step you take. Instead a machine uses your location to advertise nearby partners, provide you with services etc.

          No actual human at Google gives a f where you are right now and what you’re doing…

  • Gunpachi@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope more newer phones get supported by them.

    I have a samsung galaxy s23 and I need to scratch my de-google / custom rom itch.

      • EDRBd97kWbT2KzK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        GrapheneOS only supports modern pixels though. LineageOS is the one with the largest compatibility with both modern and older devices.

  • Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have been using it for a while on my Fairphone 3, just works nicely :)

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m using iode which is very similar and I’m happy with it. It’s a good compromise. It doesn’t have any google apps, have some additional security and privacy protections and ‘it just works’.

  • MotherFlocker@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wish I could try it out but couldn’t successfully install it on my device. So I’m sticking with LOS. LOS is already good enough (if not great) as it’s stable and gets update more often.

    • bug@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it does have an app store, one that functions similarly to Aurora. Also nothing is forcing you to use that cloud storage, use whichever you want!